i like him. in a couple years when he is at his peak and if the lakers still have kobe they are gonna be a force to reckoned with.
2007-12-27 04:51:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by jerpack4 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I agree. I always watch the Lakers alot, and it's damn obvious the development of Andrew Bynum. This guy's a player. Mitch Kupchak, this is me formally apologizing for calling you a ******** and other obscenities for not trading Bynum for Kidd. What we didnt see last year and 2 years ago is the amount of potential this young guy had. Stoudemire fell off. That ***** aint **** these days. He sho aint as dominant as before (I know his injuries hurtin him, but that's reality). The muthfucka that made 1st team all NBA last year (I still dont feel his *** shoulda been on that list over Yao), wont even make the 3rd team. And watching that Lakers/PHX game on Xmas day, it made it one of the best Xmas I done ever had. Finally, the Lakers are good. Whooping Phoenix's ***. Bynum definitely outplayed stoudemire. Bynum is a legit candidate for Most improved player. I truly hope this is the year Phil and Kobe win their last championship.
2007-12-27 13:03:39
·
answer #2
·
answered by cdub88 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
This just shows how bad the Suns' interior defense is. Amare can't guard anybody without fouling, and whoever else they have in there are as soft as tissue paper on defense. Bynum is a solid player with the talent to be a star in the future, but right now he's not as good as he looked against the Suns. In fact here's a list of big men who had their season high against the Suns this season: Tim Duncan, Jermaine O'neal, Chris Bosh (career high), Al Jefferson (tied career high, Andrew Bynum (career high), Rasho Nesterovich. And the following players scored their 2nd highest points this season against Phoenix: Dwight Howard, Shaquille O'Neal, Chris Wilcox, Yao Ming.
I'm not taking anything from Bynum's performance, those stats would be great against any team, but it seems to me any player with a decent post game is gonna go wild against the Suns.
2007-12-27 13:24:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by kyle d 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Who knows, Bynum is 5 years younger than Stoudemire?
2007-12-27 13:39:08
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I like him but he is certainly not better than Stoudemire. One game doesn't mean that he's better than Stoudemire, maybe Amare was just having a bad game.
2007-12-27 12:52:35
·
answer #5
·
answered by sports fan 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
do you get the feeling that maybe, just maybe... bynum is rated because of his young age?
it's like appreciating your young kid brother when he does something good and cute?
what would happen 3 years from now when your kid bro enter high school, when mom and dad won't be around to drive him to his games?
2007-12-27 13:09:01
·
answer #6
·
answered by le sabre 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It happens once in a lifetime.
2007-12-27 12:53:12
·
answer #7
·
answered by iLike:Basketball,Cricket,Tennis 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
of course he is better than stoudamire he is a beast/ baby shaq.
2007-12-27 12:59:15
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
one game doesnt make him better
2007-12-27 12:50:54
·
answer #9
·
answered by smallz11 3
·
1⤊
1⤋