http://www.wsws.org/articles/2007/nov2007/demo-n17.shtml
2007-12-27 04:14:48 · 11 answers · asked by justgoodfolk 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Because many, many conservatives are clueless demagogues.
2007-12-27 04:17:41 · answer #1 · answered by ideogenetic 7 · 9⤊ 1⤋
Sweet Heart,This is not meant as a smart answer, But ,honestly people have run out of names, to call Hillary and stay nice about it. So they are just trying to stay in the nice zone, Me ,"I like calling a spade a spade." Hillary life Say's it all to me. But to my surprise some people want still more of her..And the majority will win this election. If the good people of America don't get out there and vote. May God have mercy on the ones that did and did not vote for Her. We all will pay.Poor Obama, will be in a world of trouble.because, he dared to challenge her. Just you wait and see. I don't think even Oprah can help him then.
2007-12-27 04:32:35 · answer #2 · answered by Bee Bee 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Because some of her goals are more characteristic of a socialist government and economy. She isn't a socialist. If people call her that, it's a misnomer. It's like calling someone a fascist if they believe that there should be tighter controls on communications during war time. FDR was both, if those names are used indiscriminately.
2007-12-27 04:25:42 · answer #3 · answered by Snow Globe 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Because she gives no one a straight answer. She goes where the wind blows. All she cares about is herself, and a place in history, any history. She suffers from an inferiority complex. You name your cliche, maybe she was not hug enough or too much, maybe she was not the cheerleader, not very popular, ugly, she did not fit in, too dorky, etc... so power is what now makes her feel good. She could care less about her husband, daughter, or any one else. She is out there for herself. It is very obvious to anyone, that she is indeed a control monster, and when something does not go her way, the blame immediately shifts to someone else, this is due to a tremendous sense of insecurity, wanting to fit in, she is not capable of standing by her decisions, because she does not believe in them, she doubts herself. It is easier to shift the blame, and lie than to admit to making the wrong decision. Of course this only brings a path of destruction, just look at her husband, the same issue. Remember, no more dangerous place than between a TV camera and the clintons. They need a sense of approval, because they are insecure.
2007-12-27 04:34:11 · answer #4 · answered by aattaacckk 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
It is pretty simple, Hillary panders for votes, thus changes her stance to fit the crowd in front of which she is speaking. This may appease the crowd at the moment but gives fuel to each side once published.
Nobody should support her until she gives a straight stance on all of issues. To date she has but one....no water boarding for any reason.
2007-12-27 04:24:56 · answer #5 · answered by mymadsky 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I was on another site recently and a leftist was screaming that she is a neocon and a rightie was screeching she's a communist.
What a bunch of hysterical fools, she's actually a very centrist candidate.
If both the far right and the far left hate you, it seems like a pretty good recipe for getting elected, although she's not my first choice I will support her in the general if she gets the nomination.
2007-12-27 04:22:34 · answer #6 · answered by celticexpress 4 · 5⤊ 2⤋
The obvious answer is that she's anathema to them both.
I greatly admired her as First Lady, but I wouldn't want her as President. She just strikes me as too caustic and opportunistic.
I truly hope Obama becomes the final candidate. In my 25+ years of voting, he is the first ethical candidate I've ever encountered. And God knows, the last thing we need is just another power-hungry politician in the White House.
2007-12-27 05:50:18 · answer #7 · answered by The Snappy Miss Pippi Von Trapp 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Because relatively speaking that is correct, she has to be to the left of the conservatives, because very little is to the right of them.
In reality she is a candidate from the Democrat faction of the corporate party, and is to the right of the other Democrat candidates, and public opinion.
2007-12-27 05:31:04 · answer #8 · answered by . 5 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Hillary is actually a centrist. Those that don't recognize that are just too ignorant.
2007-12-27 08:56:32 · answer #9 · answered by mstrywmn 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Since when is a more than 50% approval a "loser to nearly everyone"? You have strange math, there, Mother Superior.
"Socialism" is a term right-wingers use to mean "anything I don't like".
2007-12-27 04:23:18 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 1⤋