Giuliani said the assassination underscored a need...?

Question

for the U.S. to increase its efforts to combat terrorism.

"Her murderers must be brought to justice, and Pakistan must continue the path back to democracy and the rule of law," Giuliani said in a statement. "Her death is a reminder that terrorism anywhere - whether in New York, London, Tel-Aviv or Rawalpindi - is an enemy of freedom. We must redouble our efforts to win the terrorists' war on us."

Question: Giuliani is so right about this ! u agree?

Answer 1

I agree also!
Rudy in 08

Answer 2

for those that are trying to blame Mushareff please take the time to learn what is really going on.

The main suspects in Benazir Bhutto’s assassination are the Pakistani and foreign Islamist militants who saw her as a heretic and an American stooge and had repeatedly threatened to kill her.

Ms Bhutto narrowly escaped an assassination attempt in October, when a suicide bomber killed about 140 people at a rally in the port city of Karachi to welcome her back from eight years in exile.

Earlier that month, two militant warlords based in Pakistan's lawless northwestern areas, near the border with Afghanistan, had threatened to kill her on her return.

One was Baitullah Mehsud, a top commander fighting the Pakistani army in the tribal region of South Waziristan. He has close ties to al Qaeda and the Afghan Taleban.

The other was Haji Omar, the “amir” or leader of the Pakistani Taleban, who is also from South Waziristan and fought against the Soviets with the Mujahideen in Afghanistan.

You could possibly blame the goverenment for not providing enough protection but almost all the signs point to it being the same people that treid to kill her who also happens to be OUR ENEMIES

Answer 3

Rudy Giuliani hasn't been right about anything in 15 years.

Giuliani is a power freak nut case. He saved the city money by not upgrading the emergency radio system, although he had years to do it. This resulted in the deaths of emergency personnel on 9/11. He married his second cousin (how trailer trash can you get), divorced his second wife at a press conference (she found out when reporters ran up to her on the street to ask her about it). He absconded with 2000 boxes of documents when he left office -documents that belong by law to the City of New York. He did away with free speech on the steps of city hall. He had the taxpayers foot the bill for his affair with his current wife.

How much sleaze can you take? Only an idiot would vote for this philandering, gutless, spineless, malodorous heap of parrot droppings.

(Apologies to Monty Python)

Answer 4

Yeah pretty much.

The alternative to growing a democracy in Iraq would be the retaliatory immolation of areas believed responsible for future attacks on the US.

Answer 5

Every time Giuliani opens his mouth I think he's more and more crazy. How does he automatically know this was done by terrorists? No one has claimed responsibility and it was most likely orchestrated by Musharaf. Facts just get in the way when you're pushing an agenda I suppose.

Answer 6

So, we must ask, what does this mean, for the US to increase its 'effort to fight terrorism'?

To, against international law and will, preemptively invade another nation that had naught to do with 9/11? To clamp down on dissenters at home because they are 'traitors'? To imprison people in Gitmo without regard to the Geneva Convention? To disregard your Constitition, one of the most brilliant documents ever produced, in order to 'fight terror'?

What then will be left to fight for, if the spirit in which your nation was founded, is destroyed?

Answer 7

Guliani's sentences contain 3 things: A Noun, A Verb, and 9/11.

If he's not talking about anything but fighting terrorism, then he's not talking at all.

Answer 8

He is absolutely right and people like Bhutto are willing to place themselves in harms way in order to advance the cause of freedom which is something most of our fellow Americans would NOT do.

Answer 9

Sure! So who ordered her death? The Current President of Pakistan? Al-qaeda? W? What terrorists?? Who would benefit the most? AH!! There's the Question!!!

Answer 10

Didn't President Bush say that those who harbor terrorists "will be held to account" or something? Did this mean they would be held to their financial aid accounts? Why did Bush give billions in financial aid to the anti-democratic leader of Pakistan- the country where Bin Laden is known to be hiding?

This gets curioser and curioser.

Answer 11

To answer your question;

I agree, the US must be given the permission to hunt terrorist in Pakistan, something the democrats will not allow US forces to do.