...and the President didn't give Pervez Musharraf billions in financial aid for his anti-democratic regime?
2007-12-27 03:50:22 · 7 answers · asked by ideogenetic 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
For the hurt conservatives who are finally seeing the light...look up the word 'blowback' to understand what we've been warning you about for YEEEAAAARRRSS!
2007-12-27 04:06:11 · update #1
Well we really don't know who did this yet or how it happened. But I still don't believe that catching Bin Laden would have made much of a difference in Al Qaeda. Bin Laden is a phony, he's a politician, if he were half the self-righteous crusader he says he is he would have blown himself up 10 years ago. Bin Laden himself is no real threat, there will be an Al Qaeda with or without him. I guess you could argue that Al Qaeda could be much weaker if the US had focused on Al Qaueda rather than Iraq, and that could very well be true, but there is still the possibility of some random nut doing this too.
2007-12-27 03:57:24 · answer #1 · answered by Political Analyst 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
This is exactly why I have such trouble accepting Liberals. I have many diverse political opinions, but this staunch political rhetoric is simple-minded hate.
What is ridiculous is the Liberals are already blaming Bush without any information. It's typical. Then you attack Conservatives? How foolish are you?
2007-12-27 03:59:02 · answer #2 · answered by Stereotypemebecauseyouknow 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
To answer your question;
No, but just think what the world would be like if Clinton would have accepted Sudan's offer to hand over bin Laden on a silver platter.
2007-12-27 03:56:18 · answer #3 · answered by T-Bone 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Bhutto would still be alive if Bill and HILLARY had not let Bin Laden go an several occasions and i saw someplace and i will try to find it for you that it was retaliation for Monica.
2007-12-27 03:55:42 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
This type of question can't be answered and isn't of much use. You know are fulfilling the predictions of the Bush apologists who would said people would use this story to bash Bush .....(sigh)
Your question is about as smart as hitman's answer, you two deserve each other.
But then again the it's Clinton's fault answers are pretty funny too.
2007-12-27 03:55:47 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I knew you Bush haters would find a way to blame Bush. Liberals are so predictable.
2007-12-27 03:53:29 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
We would make sure trhat they would fight with each other. Who said that?
2007-12-27 03:58:37 · answer #7 · answered by M R 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋