Some in Pakistan are calling Musharraf a killer. It started at the hospital where Bhutto was being treated and subsequentially died. It is believed Musharraf had her assinated, as she opposed his leadership and was running for Election and favored to win.
2007-12-27 02:39:47 · 14 answers · asked by canam 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Musharraf did not have anything to do with it, so it is especially scary to think the baying mob accusing him, not only did Al Q/Taliban murder her but they are able to deflect the anger of her supporters against Musharraf, they must be laughing their crazy bearded heads off in their cave hideouts.
2007-12-27 04:56:44 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't think Musharraf would have had her killed. The man may be ruthless, but he's not stupid. I think it was the Taliban. They tried to kill her as soon as she flew home from exile. Looks like they succeeded this time.
Edit#1: Hey Floyd, remember the US was the one that wanted Musharraf to lift martial law. He tried to do the right thing by keeping a lid on this, but WE wouldn't let him, and this is the price we pay for reigning him in!
2007-12-27 02:56:08 · answer #2 · answered by texasjewboy12 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not a chance. Taliban, or some group of that ilk who are very anti democracy, very anti-women in government and saw Bhutto as friendly to the west. Even more so than Musharraf.
2007-12-27 02:49:42 · answer #3 · answered by Patrick H 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
ah properly because of the fact the assumption is going.. something evil has have been given some thing to do with american and israeli schedule or al-qaeda! the component is that she did no longer had in simple terms one or 2 enemies. regular people like her have countless fighters. some have been in rival political events who could have long gone directly to do away together with her, some have been area of the terrorists that are recent interior the fringes of pakistan and a few have been needless to say alqaeda and a few worldwide agencies (american or israeli? probable). then there are additionally speculations of secret agencies being in touch in this.. so although the case, without an self reliant and impartial learn that produces outcomes on time, we actually can no longer attain to a undeniable end and could be left groping interior the lifeless of nighttime amid those varieties of speculations and rumors. regrettably pakistan's historic previous shows that the killings of standard figures have in no way been conclusively investigated. liaquat ali khan, the 1st top minister of pakistan grow to be assassinated on the comparable place by applying a guy or woman who grow to be shot at at present after he killed the large chief. no results of the learn has ever been accomplished. Ziaul Haq died 'mysteriously' in a aircraft crash and no you may actually desire to be sure how. enable's in simple terms desire we can locate the reality at the back of Benazir's dying.
2016-10-09 05:56:03 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What is happening in Pakistan and Afghanistan now have their origin in the desire to push back the Soviet invaders from Afghanistan in the early 1980s.Talibans were trained in Pakistan. Alqaeda terrorists - Muslim extremists from several Arab, African, Asian countries - have been encouraged to join forces in the pushing back of soviets.Thus they were friends once.After the pushing back of Soviets the bickerings started between friends turned foes. An immediate provocation was Iraq invading Kuwait on pretext of stealing of their OIL by Kuwaitis.Then rest is recent History.
Pakistan has become a nursery for terrorists. They say one who plays by the sword has to die by it. Poor Benazir Bhutto might not have been a player.
2007-12-27 03:19:55 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If Musharraf wanted her dead, it would have happened a long time ago. This is a long time Taliban tactic. The last thing the Extremist want is a woman in power, especially a woman who was very friendly to the west.
2007-12-27 03:14:47 · answer #6 · answered by 2nd AD/ 4th ID 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
In a way, yes, because he made a half-assed attempt to provide adequate security for her and did little to investigate previous attempts on her life. I don't understand why he lifted the state of emergency last week when it was still obvious that she was in danger.
This whole situation confirms my suspicion that Musharraf is talking the talk but not walking the walk when it comes to fighting terrorism. The fact that this country has nuclear weapons scares the **** out of me.
2007-12-27 02:51:15 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
It's either Musharraf or AlQaeda/Taliban, although suicide bombers would seem to be an AlQaeda/Taliban tactic and not a Musharraf tactic, don't you think?
.
2007-12-27 02:51:33 · answer #8 · answered by ? 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I doubt it. What would he gain? Right now, he's facing civil war.
I think it was religious fanatics, either Taliban related or some uncontrollable splinter group.
Or it could have just been one nutjob, like with JFK.
It really doesn't matter "who" did it at this point. The monster is out of the cage right now.
2007-12-27 03:35:04 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
He didn't do much to protect her; but it will never be proven he had a hand in it, even if he did. We have given Pakistan millions of dollars to fight terrorism. Where do you think the money is going ?
2007-12-27 03:23:10 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋