http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071227/ap_on_re_as/pakistan
2007-12-27 00:58:08 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Anybody think Musharref had something to do with this?
2007-12-27 01:15:32 · update #1
Hard to say, but what is fairly obvious is that it was a professional inside (military) job, a suicide bomber with a backup shooter armed with bullets which can pierce bulletproof glass (easy to obtain). Somebody in security detail let both of them through (there were metal detectors which were used to check the attendants of the rally). She campaigned on eliminating not just terrrorism, but also extremism (code word for religious fundamentalists). Neither the military nor the fundamentalists (who are harboring Bin Laden) could afford to let her win the elections. So, most likely they cut a deal to have her assassinated. Nawaz who will be running against Musharraf is not a threat, corrupt and easily manipulated from behind the scenes. The military will use Bhutto assassination to consolidate power (marshall law) and will use it as an excuse for a brutal crackdown on whomever it considers a threat. Country will be destabilized for a short while and then military will return to controlling the political scene. This assassination was a blow to Indians who hoped to have somebody like Bhutto in power. Her father was hanged by general Zia ul Haq, (one of Musharraf's predecessors) and she came from a family with long political tradition. A great blow for democracy everywhere and a brutal blow for fight to have a voice of reason in Pakistani government.
I am deeply saddened by her death and bow my head to her legacy in respect. Rest in Peace Benazir, you were a courageous woman who was not afraid to put her life on the line in an attempt to help her country. The world will miss you.
2007-12-27 01:26:17 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 0⤋
I'm not sure if Musharraf had anything to do with it or not, whether it was backed by the pentagon or just her "other" enemies, but it's a disaster. For Pakistan, for democracy, for the world and even for Musharraf. I know now he's going to get more support from US, but his support at home will decrease even more. If the election doesn't happen in time, there's a big chance of the new general overthrowing Musharraf, again, which will be disastrous for democracy in Pakistan.
2007-12-27 11:32:16 · answer #2 · answered by krishnokoli 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
For the World, and especially Pakistan, it sucks. Bhutto had her corruption scandal, but was still the best person to unite Pakistanis.
For Musharraf, it's the best possible outcome. Not only is he rid of a rival who had "Sacred Cow" status at home and abroad. He also has a bloody shirt to wave that can potentially rally Pakistanis behind him for awhile. At least until he does something to remind the middle class what an ****** he is.
2007-12-27 09:20:36 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
Musharref has everything to do with it which in turn means that Bush is behind it. without Bush, Musharref would not be in power and if he wasn't then Bhutto would have been the one selling out the people of Pakistahn for the American dollar.
2007-12-27 09:23:40 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 0⤋
Our nation is reaping what it has sowed and many more generations will reap what is still planted. It is Geat for Musharraf. How long will it be good for us. Short term thinking is a huge problem in less you happen to lust for wealth.
2007-12-27 17:48:28 · answer #5 · answered by Roy 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think Al Queda probably did it. Musharref had more to lose by her getting killed in that Bhutto supporters are rioting now, something he's been trying to avoid.
2007-12-27 18:08:14 · answer #6 · answered by Rainbow 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It seems to me there will be retaliation whether Musharraf had something to do with her death. Reminds me of the kill fields of Latin America. Guess the death squads moved to the middle east.
2007-12-27 12:40:53 · answer #7 · answered by gary L 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would expect that we will strengthen and solidify our support for Musharref, whereby the alternative would be our worst enemy, a super Islamic state in terrorism central that has nuclear weapons. I think this is very bad for world peace and the hope of ending the state of war in the region. I see it getting worse quickly, a very sad day indeed.
2007-12-27 09:18:32 · answer #8 · answered by HP 4 · 3⤊ 2⤋
It is really hard to say, this would justify another crack down, and, could mean that the U.S. will be more pro-active in attempting to alleviate terrorist factions located in Pakistan.
2007-12-27 09:05:37 · answer #9 · answered by alphabetsoup2 5 · 5⤊ 0⤋
This was inevitable. This complete disrespect for women is why they will lose in the end. Our girls will kick the shite out of them AND their girls will join our girls in the melee.
We love what you tried to do, Benazir! Now, go rest at the side of God.
2007-12-27 09:32:17 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋