will you people consider voting for Ron Paul then?
RON PAUL<-------«
«:::R:::»
«:::O:::»
«:::N:::»
'08
«:::P:::»
«:::A:::»
«:::U:::»
«:::L:::»
2007-12-27 00:37:54 · 11 answers · asked by RON PAUL for President 2008 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Check your back brother. You exposed the truth and now any liberal will work to silence you as you voice opposition to them.
By the way, before all of this happens, she is going to FORCE us to pay for other people's healthcare, raise taxes, take away freedom of speech, then she will do what you suggested.
2007-12-27 00:43:00 · answer #1 · answered by Voice of Liberty 5 · 6⤊ 3⤋
I am 110% for Ron Paul, but your brash approach may turn some people off to him.
A lot of liberals like gun legislation. They feel it will make their middle class, police patrolled neighborhoods safer. Outside of background checks (to make sure the consumer doesn't have a history of violence), gun control has no effect on criminal gun use. Firearm legislation is crafted with the intent of curbing violent crime, but those that are causing the crime obtain their weapons by illegal means. These laws only affect those that follow laws.
Liberals often ask,"Why would anyone need a semi-automatic weapon to hunt with?" They aren't hunting with those guns, stupid! Some people collect guns to shoot at firing ranges, some people collect cars, some people collect shoes. I collect motorcycles, but just like guns, some politicians like to try enacting poorly written legislation that affect us too.
Disarming a country is taking away it's means to deal with a corrupt government. I have never owned a gun or even fired one. Heck, my whole family is a bunch of liberal hippies but I understand how damaging firearm legislation can be (think "snowball effect", guns today, your freedoms tomorrow.)
2007-12-27 02:19:43 · answer #2 · answered by handlebar knocker 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Micro Chipping and Martial Law are a bit over the top. But should both Houses of Congress and the White House fall under Liberal Democrat control, I can easily foresee some serious anti-gun legislation coming out of Washington.
2007-12-27 00:48:25 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋
I will be a hermit in the woods before they can micro chip me. I will run and try and get to a country that does not microchip its citizens. Hopefully Canada is not plannig on doing this to as it is much closer than mexico as I am in NY.
2007-12-27 00:47:31 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
NO, Ron Paul looks and talks funny. His policies are a joke too.
2007-12-27 01:42:39 · answer #5 · answered by ? 2 · 2⤊ 4⤋
Your giving the office of President far more power than it has. One person cannot change the constitution by themself.
2007-12-27 00:59:43 · answer #6 · answered by crazy2all 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
No, your microchip will tell you you're happy. You haven't been chipped yet, have you?
2007-12-27 00:53:38 · answer #7 · answered by jelesais2000 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
remember that hillary was the one that chose janet reno for AG when she was co=president with bill, and it was reno who masterminded the waco incident..what if it wasn't an accident that 86 us citizens wre killed by federal agents but an experiment to see if they could get away with it (which they did)..your scenario with hillary is terrifyingly possible...
2007-12-27 00:46:49 · answer #8 · answered by mrjones502003 4 · 5⤊ 3⤋
Good Lord, Ron Paul is a decent man but your not helping his cause. Please stop posting ridiculous questions.
2007-12-27 00:43:38 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 4⤋
Maybe you should back Hillary.
She is for universal heath care and can get you the medication you so desparately need,
2007-12-27 00:57:04 · answer #10 · answered by Jam_Til_Impact 5 · 3⤊ 6⤋