2007-12-26 23:04:09 · 34 answers · asked by G.xi 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Nothing, because there is no such evidence.
2007-12-27 02:19:18 · answer #1 · answered by Stargazer 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Adam & Eve (or Adam & Awwa in Islam) are the great great grand parents for all of us. It's mentioned in Bible as well as in Quran about this. Quran is the direct words from the god & is the most trustable one so how can we say that we should believe in Archeology more than the holy Bible& Holy Quran.
Give me a thumbs up or down but the true fact is that there is solutions to all the rpoblem & queries on earth in The Quran. Please understand it if you mind & brain allows.
2007-12-27 00:39:25 · answer #2 · answered by The Best 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that no one really knows how long ago Adam lived and that scientists have a track record of believing certain things to be true one decade or century and then making new discoveries where scientists of today just look down and shake their heads when asked about what scientists believed 50 or 100 or 200 years ago.
2007-12-26 23:52:52 · answer #3 · answered by Martin S 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
BUT what makes Adam different? Also why is there not one living person on earth related to any of Adam's peers? I am not disagreeing with you that people may have been before him and along side of him but what happened? You should give it much thought.
2007-12-26 23:20:59 · answer #4 · answered by יונתן 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Considering the fact that I am not a Christian or a Muslim, I have no problem with the idea... Unless, of course, the first man to take a name was known as adam...
2007-12-26 23:09:07 · answer #5 · answered by Geaux Ghoti 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The whole "geological" column is based on begging the question. (See Kent Hovind). Scripture says that sin caused death. Evolutionism says that death (survival of the fittest) caused man. The two are totally incompatible. There is a word in Hebrew which allows for the possibility that something had been here. it says the earth came to be without form... and the came to be does not definitively say what it came FROM... conclusion. Even if there are remnants older than Adam, Adam didn't come from them.
2007-12-26 23:13:10 · answer #6 · answered by hasse_john 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
The story of Adam and Eve is but an allegory to drive home the lesson that if you fall a prey to the sensual enjoyment, you are bound to fall. Adam is synonymous for Atman and eve for jeevatman. Atma is the higher consciousness which is capable of deriving happiness or ananda from its own source and jeeva or lower consciousness loses that ananda for the sin of choosing pleasure from the senses.
2007-12-26 23:16:15 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
The Bible only talks about the time that Adam was cast out of Eden. know record of how long Adam was in eden. I'm sure it took a few years to name all the animals and what about the time before Eve. Adam didn't age before sin, so could have been millions of years.
autumn moon I can see your point that most Christians would miss (Isaiah34 :14 the screech owl owl also shall rest there,) and not understanding that that is talking about lilith. What can you do with those Christian again that old blind faith. Thank God for pagans. God bless
2007-12-26 23:11:18 · answer #8 · answered by furgetabowdit 6 · 0⤊ 4⤋
I would say they are probably right since chances are he never exhisted and was just a story to let people know the downfalls of knowledge and asking too many questions.
P.S.- Eve was not the first woman of the bible, check the Old Testament. They always forget Adam's first wife, Lilith.
2007-12-26 23:13:00 · answer #9 · answered by Autumn Moon 3 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Yay archeology!
2007-12-26 23:06:42 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
who said that adam was the first man!
2007-12-27 01:08:41 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋