English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

http://www.buydig.com/shop/product.aspx?sku=TM70300DINA

2007-12-26 16:46:50 · 6 answers · asked by geoff. 2 in Arts & Humanities Visual Arts Photography

6 answers

I would be inclined to write exactly what Mere Mortal has written, especially the part about maybe getting away with this on a digital SLR.

Look at electrosmack's images, though, and they are beautiful. Of course, we can not judge how true the colors are, but look at the flower... Check out the spider web! That's pretty darn sharp in my book.

While we do tend to think of lenses lasting forever, what's the worst that can happen if you spend under $200 for a lens? If it seems like a lot of money to you, just wait ten years and you will not hesitate to just buy whatever 70-300 lens you think is better.

As far as range, it's extremely useful. See http://www.flickr.com/photos/samfeinstein/tags/70300/ for some from the Nikon version in a VR lens. VR does help, but it costs...

To compare sharpness, you might want to look at e.s.'s flower and this chipmunk for detail:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/samfeinstein/536590467/

If you are young or the budget is tight, I'd rather see you get the lens now and enjoy it instead of saving for another year for one that it better, but not by THAT much. You can buy a better one somewhere down the road.

2007-12-26 17:17:57 · answer #1 · answered by Picture Taker 7 · 2 0

I have this lens in an older version. Although it doesn't see too much use, it is decent for the low price. Of course, it is not a top of the line lens, but with a dSLR you will be using the "sweet spot". I agree with Dr Sam, if you can afford this one now, go ahead and buy it now. The lens you have in your hand now takes better pictures than the lens that will sit on the store shelf for another couple of years. And Buydig's ratings are all right on resellerratings.com. You can save up for a better one as you are using this one and finding its limitations. Or you may find this one is adequate for your needs. Not every photographer needs the top of the line in every lens made. Good luck.

2007-12-27 00:12:56 · answer #2 · answered by Ara57 7 · 1 0

I have that same exact lens, only for a Nikon mount. Overall, It's a good lens. Obviously, it's not the best optically, but it does do a good job. Try not to shoot in dull or cloudy weather, since the lens does not perform too well under these conditions.

Here is a link to some of the images that I've taken with it:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/59181982@N00/2069617445/

http://www.flickr.com/photos/59181982@N00/2068025320/

Hope this helps. For anymore sample images, don't hesitate to ask via Flickr mail, or just by posting on one of the images. I'll be happy to help.

2007-12-26 16:54:56 · answer #3 · answered by electrosmack1 5 · 1 0

This would be acceptable on a DSLR because you use the center of the lens.

However, I would certainly stay away from it if you plan to use it on a 35mm SLR.

You get what you pay for. Save up a few more dollars and get the best. You will go through a number of bodies but you may keep your glass for years.

2007-12-26 16:59:35 · answer #4 · answered by Mere Mortal 7 · 4 0

you get what you pay for

2007-12-26 16:53:40 · answer #5 · answered by Unoptrid1aq 4 · 1 0

cheap price usually means poor quality..................

2007-12-26 16:52:12 · answer #6 · answered by richard t 7 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers