English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

12 answers

Why should they give the child up? Is their age you object to? Or being actors?

Assuming that they have the financial support and are not totally incompetent, I don't see any good reason that they should give up the child.

2007-12-26 14:28:16 · answer #1 · answered by blank stare 6 · 13 1

i have no idea who you are talking about but i fell pregnant at 16. whats the difference if there famous or not, their still human. and obviously humans make mistakes! Oops! i did it again. there are millions of teens having babies, should every single teen give their baby up for adoption??? if these kids are actors (they must have some money) then they can probably give their kid a much better start then most 16yr olds can. why give it away?

2007-12-26 22:34:20 · answer #2 · answered by Moz 4 · 10 1

Don't know who they are, but no, if you're referring to age as a factor for relinquishing, I don't think that they should; 15 and 16 is not too young especially if they have just a bit of support - gee, that can really go a long way!

2007-12-26 22:37:22 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 6 1

no they have the support from their family and financially to give their baby a good life. so i believe they should hold up to their responsibility's. they are old enough to make a baby so they are old enough to take care of the baby cus they already have jobs and could actually give a baby stability.

2007-12-27 03:42:29 · answer #4 · answered by i love marco c. 2 · 5 0

No. Not at all.

I have a friend whose mother had him at fifteen. She had an excellent support system and was able to go to college, get a degree and have a very successful life. My friend is also successful and has the utmost respect for his mother and her choices in raising him.

Being young and having a child is not an impossible situation. It can be challenging but it is doable.

2007-12-26 23:25:52 · answer #5 · answered by Isabel A 4 · 9 2

I have no idea who Sarah and Freddie are, but what is the reason they should relinquish their child? You make reference to their ages. My grandmother was 14 when she had my mother, who was in turn 16 when she had me. My father was 17. I know plenty of other families who started out young as well. Young age is far from a good enough reason to do something as absolutely drastic as give away one's own flesh and blood.

2007-12-26 22:28:44 · answer #6 · answered by LaurieDB 6 · 13 4

Where is the proof she is even pregnant? I keep looking online and seeing nothing.

2007-12-27 01:28:56 · answer #7 · answered by Zyggy 7 · 6 0

no they shouldn't give the baby up.

2007-12-27 01:12:41 · answer #8 · answered by Valentine 5 · 6 0

That is a decision only they can make.

2007-12-27 11:38:57 · answer #9 · answered by LaraSue 6 · 1 3

i guess it is NO, if d baby is fruit of love!!

2007-12-27 03:26:53 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 7 1

fedest.com, questions and answers