1) The adulations of those whom believe in a God which others say does not exist?
or
2) The complaints of those as to why they would go to hell for not believing in the God they don't believe exists in the first place?
2007-12-26
14:04:52
·
14 answers
·
asked by
♫DaveC♪♫
7
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality
If you answer #1, you've failed to use the logic you claim makes Evolution make sense.
If you answer #2, then you must be a believer in God.
2007-12-26
14:06:03 ·
update #1
Trying to ignore the question altogether means you see the fallacy of those in category #2.
2007-12-26
14:09:36 ·
update #2
Thumbs up so far to:
Rev. Albert Einstein
MadforMAC
bratnumber5
Eds
seenotes, ABOC
rob
God bless.
2007-12-26
14:18:29 ·
update #3
what ever I am saved, so i have no worries,,, how about you?
2007-12-26 14:08:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Number 1 makes less sense, and your additional details make no sense at all.
Oh, and there is no fallacy in number 2. It is damned annoying when people tell me that I'm going to a hell that I don't believe in. It is annoying because I hear it almost every day from my family. I my mind, it makes perfect sense to complain about something that annoys me.
Rev. Albert Einstein -- Thank you for providing quotes that are either completely made up, or completely taken out of context.
2007-12-26 22:12:09
·
answer #2
·
answered by Harry 5
·
1⤊
3⤋
**It is amazing to me that laymen who push evolution theory so vehemently don't even know what most evolutionary scientists have said about the fossil record....
Even Charles Darwin was honest when he confesses in 'Origin of Species'; " But as by THIS THEORY innumerable transitional forms must have existed, why do we NOT find them embedded in countless numbers in the crust of the earth?" -Charles Darwin
To the above fact, even the most world renown (evolutionary) biologists today agree.....
." New species almost always appear suddenly in the fossil record with NO intermediate links to ancestors in older rocks in the same region. The fossil record with its abrupt transitions OFFERS NO SUPPORT for gradual change". - Stephen J. Gould (Natural History , June, 1977, p.22)
"The extreme rarity (of transitional forms) in the fossil record persists as the 'trade secret' of palentology. The evolutionary tree (diagarms) that adorn our textbooks is.....NOT the evidence of fossils". - Stephen Gould (Natural History, 1977, vol.86, p.13)
"Evolution REQUIRES intermediate forms between species and paleontology DOES NOT provide them" (David Kitts, paleontologist and evolutionist).
According to Scripture NOTHING evolved but everything was created "AFTER ITS KIND"....which is directly consistent with the fossil record.
The thing to remember is that evolution is just a theory, a speculation, an unproven assumption....and NOT supported by the fossil record.
"From the beginning of the Creation God made them male and female..."-- Jesus (Mk. 10:6)
2007-12-26 22:08:01
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
4⤋
No. 1. Oh, and No. 2 is usually people being hypothetical to prove a point.
You look like my neighbor.
2007-12-26 22:08:50
·
answer #4
·
answered by Gen•X•er (I love zombies!) 6
·
2⤊
3⤋
The least sense comes about in wasteful abundance here on R&S.
Peace.
2007-12-26 22:14:40
·
answer #5
·
answered by Blame Amy 5
·
2⤊
2⤋
This question makes very little sense. I do not complain about hell. I do not believe in it, so why complain?
2007-12-26 22:25:16
·
answer #6
·
answered by in a handbasket 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
Discussing and defending a concept that is not fully understood.
That makes the least of senses.
2007-12-26 22:09:30
·
answer #7
·
answered by Aritmentor 5
·
0⤊
3⤋
Dave,
It makes more sense to me that we should do exactly what GOD has told us to do. That is why HE sent CHRIST and HIS HOLY WORD to us. Have a wonderful week.
Thanks,
Eds
.
2007-12-26 22:09:45
·
answer #8
·
answered by Eds 7
·
3⤊
2⤋
#2 plain and simple
2007-12-26 22:09:54
·
answer #9
·
answered by Seeno†es™ 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
Your question makes zero sense.
2007-12-26 22:19:40
·
answer #10
·
answered by Justin D 5
·
1⤊
3⤋
I must concur with neil
cheers!
2007-12-26 22:08:53
·
answer #11
·
answered by michael 6
·
3⤊
2⤋