Atheists: what is your proof god Doesn't exist?

Question

As in not the world is a **** hole and people in religion fight alot but actual proof that it dosn't exist

I am not here to give my side of the storie you give me yours

B-Krak good piont but what is the proof it dosn't exist

sweet I am the 1,000,000th asker what do I win

Scourge here is my http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flying_Spaghetti_Monster

Marcus The reason pink unicorns don't exist is because there are no tracks no smell no image on thermal vision is that proof enough

Answer 1

Atheists have absolutely no proof that God doesn't exist. They don't have any proof, and they never will - because its impossible to prove a universal negative. What you think about the existence of God is just a matter of what you believe because there is absolutely no proof one way or the other. Both views lacking pure evidence, then, require faith no matter how little or how great. So the big question arises of what you would rather believe. Did a God bring about this complex world, or was it all just a cosmic accident? Every sculpture was created by a sculptor, every painting was created by an artist, and every book has an author. It only makes sense that this world, likewise, has a God who created it.

Answer 2

The question that you asked shows a marked shallowness and lack of understanding of basic rational reasoning. So-God or not god--neither of these hypothesis can be proved. Because either can neither be proved or disproved-the basis assumption of God or not god is a philosophical one. From the basic assumption of God or not god either relgion or atheism springs (either position since it can not be proved is a faith based assumption). Why should one take the not god position over the God position. With the not god position-all that is required is fundamental properties of matter and energy and their interactions--nothing further is required. For the God position it requires the use of (for lack of a better word) magic, suspension of causality, and an enormous increase in the free energy of the universe. (The entire universe consists of the sum total of entropy and enthalpic factors--if one assumes a God that interacts with the universe--then in order to be an information processesing active participant that must entropy must be low and energy high in this god thing. If this god thing interacts with our universe then there is a input of entropic and enthalpic factors inputted into our universe--therefore free energy of the universe increases--in direct opposition to the observed). From a logical reasoning point, the not god hypothesis is the more logical of the two.

Answer 3

Not for me to prove. I also don't believe in unicorns, faeries, big foot, that Elvis lived after his reported death, etc.... and I happily admit I can't prove that those claims aren't true. I just feel the absence of evidence to indicate they are true is enough to justify my not actually believing such things. Same with deities for me. Since I'm not making the claim and asking others to believe it I feel no reason or need to prove faeries don't exist to justify my not believing they do. Its pretty impossible to prove the nonexistence of something.

Answer 4

There is far more evidence to support the theory of evolution, and that there were dinosaurs long before there were mammals. If all the animals of today, including humans, were the first beings on Earth, then why is there so little evidence to support that theory? And do not say, 'the Bible is evidence', because it's not.

Answer 5

A complete lack of evidence suggesting its existence is a good start.

edit: Things that don't exist don't leave evidence they don't exist.

Thus- there is no "proof god doesn't exist". Its not necessary, nor is it possible. Is there any proof that a 3-balled Bridge Troll doesn't exist?

Answer 6

If you can show me your proof that the Invisible Pink Unicorn doesn't exist, then I will show you equal proof of the nonexistence of your god.

Answer 7

Let me see if I understand what you are asking. Are you asking for us to take each and every god believed in in the world today and prove it individually not to exist, or can we play each off against the others?

Answer 8

For the zillionth time...:

The person making the positive claim bears the burden of proof...

Answer 9

Where is your proof that the Flying Spaghetti Monster doesn't really control everything?

Answer 10

I don't claim god doesn't exist. I just don't believe he does. There's a difference. It's subtle, though. Believers are generally not big fans of subtle.