do u think its spoiled for an 7 year old to have a cell phone and an apple touch ipod?

Answer 1

Hell yes. Kids should be no older than 15, before they have those items. You better think hard about this. Once you create this monster, there's no going back.

Answer 2

an ipod probably not, but a cell phone? Is your 7 year old getting in her car and driving out on the town. Is she constatly staying at her friends houses and calling you for a ride home? Also alot of schools suspend children that bring cell phones to school. Why waste the money on a cell phone that your 7 year old could potentially lose and should hardly ever need since a 7 year old should be at home most of the time if not at school or occasionally at a friends in which you drop her off and pick her up. I think a cell phone is way over the top

Answer 3

Yes. I do. A cell phone? Who does a 7 year old have to call? Do her friends also have phones so that they can answer when they call? As a child, I could only talk on the house phone and my mom wouldn't let me stay on that for very long. A cell phone seems to give way too much freedom for a child that is still so young that she/he needs restrictions. The ipod isn't such a big deal to me, although. Yeah, it's high tech and it's a bit snooty to give one to a 7 year old, but I can see that way before I can see a kid that small with a cell phone.

Answer 4

i do no longer think of he's spoiled. If he's grateful for those issues and is familiar with that it's not a necessity yet a privilege to have advantageous stuff then it quite is okay. whilst he factors out that his acquaintances have the stuff he's in simple terms being a new child. I truthfully have a telephone an ipod and a working laptop or pc and that i'm 15 practically sixteen. If he's saving up for the pc himself then you definately shouldn't provide up him from procuring it. it quite is his own money and if he earns it on his own then he could desire to have the skill to purchase although he needs (fairly needless to say, no longer something irrelevant.) From what you're saying i do no longer think of he's spoiled in simple terms privileged. :)

Answer 5

Yes, that's ridiculous. Kids shouldn't have cell phones until they're in high school and no 7 year old needs an iPod.

Answer 6

Although these things aren't necessary, whether or not it could be considered spoiling depends on what ELSE the child has.

If on top of these things the child has a computer, tv, email, wii, etc. then yes, definitely spoiled.

If however the child has fewer toys and "things" then no, I wouldn't say s/he's spoiled for having these two items.

Answer 7

Yes it is being spoiled a 7 year old doesn't NEED any of them.

Answer 8

he must have 7 yr. friends with phones who is he calling? About the ipod that's like okay being that there is songs on them and he can watch things. so i don't think hes spoiled just privileged.

Answer 9

to me, "spoiled" is less about what a kid has and more about their sense of entitlement.

i wouldn't call a kid who had a lot but didn't expect more, whine in toy stores, demand other stuff, or feel entitled "spoiled" (I'd probably call them "rich").

i don't think kids need those things, and personally, i don't think they're particularly good choices to give a 7-year-old. but i'd have to meet the 7-year-old to decide if they were spoiled.

Answer 10

the ipod i dont think would be spoiling but for the cellphone it depends on what is used for i wouldnt call it spoiling if it was used to call parents or an adult in case emergencies and also not to be used for calling friends.