What Was the Original Sin?
WHAT was the original sin? “Sex,” many people will answer. They believe that the forbidden fruit in the garden of Eden was a symbol of sexual relations and that Adam and Eve sinned by committing a sexual act.
The idea is not new. According to historian Elaine Pagels, “the claim that Adam and Eve’s sin was to engage in sexual intercourse” was “common among such [second-century] Christian teachers as Tatian the Syrian, who taught that the fruit of the tree of knowledge conveyed carnal knowledge.” Also, to Christendom’s Church Father Augustine of the fifth century C.E., sin had its beginnings in sexual desire on Adam’s part. In fact, Psychology Today said “Adam’s sin was carnal knowledge.”
Others have taken the position that the tree of knowledge of good and bad represented knowledge itself. The Encyclopædia Britannica asserts that the “knowledge of good and evil” was “a classic expression for all knowledge.” That would mean that God wanted Adam and Eve to be ignorant and that they rebelled against him by seeking to expand their knowledge.
Both interpretations certainly paint a picture of an unfair and capricious Creator. Why would he create man with both sexual and intellectual needs and then allow him no means of fulfilling those desires without incurring a death penalty? Who would feel drawn to love and serve such a God?
Was Sex the Original Sin?
Many do not know that both these interpretations flatly contradict the context of the Genesis account. Let’s consider first the idea that God’s prohibition in Eden was really one against sexual relations. The law in question is recorded at Genesis 2:16, 17: “From every tree of the garden you may eat to satisfaction. But as for the tree of the knowledge of good and bad you must not eat from it, for in the day you eat from it you will positively die.”
Was that really a veiled reference to sex? Well, as recorded at Genesis 1:27, 28, God commanded the man and the woman to “be fruitful and become many and fill the earth.” How were Adam and Eve to obey that command without having sexual relations? Are we really to suppose that God gave them a command and then sentenced them to death for trying to obey it?
Besides, the Genesis account shows that Adam and Eve sinned separately, not simultaneously. Chapter 3, verse 6, makes it clear that Eve was seduced to eat of the fruit first and that “afterward she gave some also to her husband when with her and he began eating it.” So eating of the forbidden fruit would make an inept and farfetched symbol of sexual intercourse.
Was It Knowledge?
What about the claim that the forbidden fruit was a symbol of all knowledge? Actually, both Adam and Eve had already taken in plenty of knowledge before they disobeyed the law at Genesis 2:16, 17. Their Creator, Jehovah himself, was directly involved in their education. For instance, he brought all animals and birds to the man for him to name them. (Genesis 2:19, 20) No doubt Adam would have had to study each one carefully in order to give it an appropriate name. What an education in zoology! Eve, although created later, was also not ignorant. When questioned by the serpent, she showed that she had been educated in God’s law. She knew the difference between right and wrong, and she even knew the consequences of wrong actions.—Genesis 3:2, 3.
Interpretation of original sin as either sex or knowledge is just that—human interpretation, nothing more. Its weakness is shown up by the question of the faithful man Joseph: “Do not interpretations belong to God?” (Genesis 40:8) The Bible is much easier to understand when we do not impose human ideas on it but, rather, let it interpret itself. What, then, was the original sin? Well, the Genesis account gives us every reason to believe that the tree of knowledge of good and bad was an actual tree. We are told where it was in the garden, and it is spoken of in relation to the other trees. Its fruit was real, and Adam and Eve actually ate the fruit.
Was It Disobedience?
By eating of that fruit, what were they doing? The New Catholic Encyclopedia timidly suggests: “It could have been, simply, an open defiance of God, an insolent refusal to obey Him.” Is that not what Genesis clearly says? Romans 5:19 confirms the point: “By one man’s disobedience many were made sinners.” (The New Jerusalem Bible) The original sin was an act of disobedience.
While a sin of disobedience may seem simple on the surface, consider its profound implications. A footnote in The New Jerusalem Bible puts it this way: “It [the knowledge of good and bad] is the power of deciding for himself what is good and what is evil and of acting accordingly, a claim to complete moral independence . . . The first sin was an attack on God’s sovereignty.” Yes, “the tree of the knowledge of good and bad” symbolized God’s prerogative to set the standards for man as to what is approved or what is condemned. By refusing to obey God’s law, man was calling into question God’s very right to rule over him. Jehovah justly answered the challenge by allowing man to rule himself. Wouldn’t you agree that the results have been disastrous?—Deuteronomy 32:5; Ecclesiastes 8:9.
That is why the Bible’s theme, God’s Kingdom, brings so much hope. By means of that Kingdom, Jehovah promises to end oppressive man-rule soon and replace it with His rule—a government that will restore an earthly paradise—something Adam and Eve forfeited.—Psalm 37:29; Daniel 2:44.
2007-12-25 10:55:24
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
When a challenge presents itself, God loves to test His subjects. Ole Lucifer was up there and he told God that these new toys He created weren't all that like He thought. That old devil told The Big Guy that he would place his life against the life of these toys on it that he could get these toys to disobey God. So, God liked a good challenge and was always willing to adapt a new design as needed if the original proto-type didn't work (that explains the dinosaurs). Well, God put two trees in the garden and told Adam and Eve to leave them alone. Well, Lucifer, knowing Eve was female and Adam had something she didn't and she kinda like it...so he took on the shape of this think and called it "Serpent". Well, Serpent went up to Eve and said "Eat this"...Eve looked at it, her eyes popped out of her head and she hollered..."That'll kill me...I'll choke to death! God, surely I'd die if I ate that!" Well, Serpent said, "Nah, you won't die and you'll feel just like God and know how to control man and get him to do anything you want." So, Eve ate the forbidden fruit and the rest is history.
2007-12-25 04:34:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by RT 66 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
In Islam Adam didnt commit a sin by eating the fruit as he was a prophet and therefore sinless - Satan fooled him. Islam also excuses Eve of any fault.
Think of all the blessings that have come from this Prophets mistake? our life here on earth, our family etc everything happy in your life
So we should be grateful to our father Adam not blame him
2007-12-25 04:34:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't like the fact either and from that Adam passed on a sin nature to me. But - Rom 9:20 "Nay but, O man, who art thou that replies against God? Shall the thing formed say to him that formed it why hast thou made me thus?" Read the rest of the chapter. We can't change what is but we can change how we respond to it. God pronounced judgment on those who disobey him but, that same judge after having pronounced judgment took off the robe, stepped down from the bench and hung himself on a cross to pay the penalty I deserve. I have accepted His work of paying my penalty and enduring the judgment I deserve repented of sin. That Judge now lives in my heart and soul. More over, since this life is temporary anyway I'm more concerned with where I will spend eternity - hence my acceptance of Christ as my savior. Read Romans Ch's 3-10. Thank you for asking this question!
2007-12-25 04:45:28
·
answer #4
·
answered by Voyager40 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
God gave us free will. He did not want to create robots on earth or angels for that matter. He wanted to give us a choice. We have choice to accept and believe in Christ Jesus as the payment on cross for our sins or not.
2007-12-25 04:30:14
·
answer #5
·
answered by Dreamcast 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Test of freewill and obedience to God's law. Also, a way to display God's mercy, compassion and forgiveness.
2007-12-25 04:26:30
·
answer #6
·
answered by Mustafa 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
The fruit is a metaphor...
The act of disobedience was the problem.
2007-12-25 04:28:56
·
answer #7
·
answered by Kazoo M 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
To show how greedy human until now which i mean normal human has their own bad side.
2007-12-25 04:27:44
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
same as it was and is for us....CHOICE
to either OBEY GOD and LIVE
or disobey and Die
as it is written
"" THIS DAY i lay before you a Blessing and a Curse...
A Blessing if you do my will , a curse if you do it not "
OBEDIEANCE is better then sacrific
2007-12-25 04:25:59
·
answer #9
·
answered by hghostinme 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
God set a trap even then for humans. Not very nice, was she?
2007-12-25 04:26:25
·
answer #10
·
answered by Fred 7
·
0⤊
1⤋