2007-12-24 11:15:39 · 25 answers · asked by Eartha Q 6 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
There is some question about this, that's why I asked. I was hoping there might be more information about it..thanks everyone for your answers.
2007-12-25 05:06:02 · update #1
Actually he was very religious. Why can't we have both evolutionand creationism? If anything, evolution displays a very complex design that only God could have created.
2007-12-24 11:19:20 · answer #1 · answered by Joe B 4 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Maybe, we don't really know.
Btw, though, isn't is funny how many people say the Bible that has much history to back it up, isn't true, but some 19th century person like Darwin with little knowledge writes a book and they demand that it is the true story of human development. Maybe those that believe Darwin's book are psychotic, could be.
Quite funny, really, don't ya think?
2007-12-24 21:17:54 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I have seen no evidence to suggest that Charles Darwin was psychotic. He was a dedicated and thorough researcher who came to a surprising and interesting conclusion as a result of an extended study of animal reproductive behaviour.
2007-12-24 19:18:51 · answer #3 · answered by Skep 2 · 3⤊ 2⤋
No, just a hard working and very smart guy who figured out how evolution worked (that evolution was a scientific fact was already known before Darwin published his theory).
2007-12-24 19:25:52 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Charles Darwin was an idiot. He didn't even believe his Own theory.
2007-12-25 09:29:53 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I think he was an atheist~ Darwin's lack of wisdom in God actually made him stupid. That is why he conceived the evolution theory~
2007-12-24 22:31:48 · answer #6 · answered by Jesus Loves Connie 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
He was a brilliant man who had an opinion. I don't agree with his opinion but that does not mean he is Psychotic.
2007-12-24 19:40:20 · answer #7 · answered by . 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
i thought believing in talking snakes was a sign of being psychotic, not the other way around
2007-12-24 19:21:59 · answer #8 · answered by Luken 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I haven't done a study on him, but I would say that he was just conveying his viewpoint, his thoughts and/ or his summation of the beginning and it took off from there.
2007-12-25 09:54:30 · answer #9 · answered by cmlrdjesus 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I can asure you that he was not psycotic ,but was a very highly advanced soul who gave to the world the education of how the 'form' aspect was developed. But he did miss the mark when he speaks of the inner evolution as souls and was something he left out of his teachings as a scientist.
2007-12-24 19:21:50 · answer #10 · answered by mike hughes 52 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋