Do you think people living in lands that are suitable for agriculture should have a predominantly meat diet and feed all the grain to animals when the same could feed many humans? Is that not gluttony even if you are not fat?
Yes, man has dominion over other life but why can't we look at it as watching over it rather than just plundering it for our needs! This world is a closed system. We have to maintain a balance! People living in deserted areas maynot have much choice other than meat but people on fertile lands do!
2007-12-24
09:44:00
·
7 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality
Is this kind of gluttony not a crime against other humans who die of starvation because the west would rather feed their grain to the cows!
2007-12-24
09:47:30 ·
update #1
Fruitcake you should visit a poor country sometime and see the quality of grain sent to people, to humans! USA feeds better grain than that to it's cattle for meat production!
2007-12-24
09:53:28 ·
update #2
Guitar what has been said applies to Indians too and they do their part being an agricultural society! Do you well to worry about africans! Mr. Singh is fine and Indians will take care of their own. The reason so many people are alive and not starving to death in India is because of a majority vegetarian population!
2007-12-24
10:13:54 ·
update #3
a predominantly meat diet could not support such a huge population! The poor you see are poor because India is not industrialised enough yet. They are not starving!
2007-12-24
10:18:30 ·
update #4