2007-12-24 05:45:12 · 8 answers · asked by Dan 2 in Consumer Electronics ➔ TVs
sony bravia
2007-12-24 05:47:41 · answer #1 · answered by dddddd 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The BRAVIA is an astounding television, yet so is the pointy. It fairly comes all the way down to cost and which seems extra effectual to you. I certainly have a 40 inch SAMSUNG 1080 which i would be unable to fault. The BRAVIA guarantee is a million year and the pointy is 3 i think of. i replaced into certainly going to get the pointy, yet I already had a 32 inch SAMSUNG and replaced into delighted with that. while the SAMSUNG 1080 got here out i assumed extra effectual the devil you comprehend.
2016-11-24 22:49:40 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i would say go for sony bravia w3000 :)
the quality of sharp is slight better than sony but the durablity of sony is way better..
sharp tvs even have dead pixel problems... future shop gets atleast 10 defective sharps every quater compared to that of max 2 for sony... but both look great
2007-12-24 06:17:47 · answer #3 · answered by sMaRtiEs 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Those were our 2 choices as for buying a LCD 4 days ago.....finally we ended buying a Sharp Aquos 42" .Quality resolution is very good,nice image from any angle you see it (even very close),also there is a lighting adapter that works alone and other features very easy to understand and use... finally cut our cost in half and got a bigger screen...
Happy holidays!
2007-12-24 06:14:39 · answer #4 · answered by Mr Catnip 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I know this wasn't on your list, but have you checked out the Samsung LNT4671F 46" 1080p 120Hz LCD HDTV?
I've seen this and the Sony playing side by side with Blu-Ray discs in, and the Samsung just killed the Sony in picture quality.
2007-12-24 09:58:57 · answer #5 · answered by Uncle Pennybags 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
sony bravia
2007-12-24 05:48:17 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
sony all the way
2007-12-24 05:48:04 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
sharp
2007-12-24 07:23:37 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋