English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If evolution is true why do so many people have a need to worship something? If evolution is true why do we need any rules? If we evolved then we should not even care to do right or wrong. Do you really think our minds evolved too! Can you not see that if you keep copying something that it will not be as good as the first thing that was copied from. If everything breaks or dies it then seems that it would be imposibble for anything to just keep getting better. Everyone even knows that you need an original thing in the first place before you can even copy something. This original thing must have something or someone that created it. Things just do not come from nothing.

2007-12-24 04:11:02 · 35 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

God has always been. He has no beginning or end.

2007-12-24 04:15:43 · update #1

35 answers

i don't believe evolution is true. God created the world and everything in it. where do you believe you go when you die,, heaven or hell right...well where have you herd that?. people wouldn't know it exists but its in the bible..so if you believe in that you should believe in God. and that God sent his son Jesus Christ to earth to live as a man and die on the cross for us!!! and he loves you! Some scientists think that the earth or whatever was created by some kind of chemical explosion...do you believe that??? what do you mean by saying there shouldn't be any rules..its called the 10 commandments...and if paople say that we kept evolving from animals and things why aren't we still eveolving???

2007-12-24 04:23:15 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

Lots of questions and falicious logic here. I'll take them one at a time.

-"Is evolution really true."
Yes.

-"If evolution is true why do so many people have a need to worship something?"
Beats me--I've never felt that need. At one time, belief was probably an evolutionary advantage. Thus, those who believed passed on the tendency to believe to their offspring.

-"If we evolved then we should not even care to do right or wrong."
An illogical argument. Moral systems need not be based on religion. Doing right (e.g. helping your neighbor, etc.) again probably resulted in an evolutionary advantage.

-"Do you really think our minds evolved too!"
Yes. Read up on evolutionary psychology.

-"Can you not see that if you keep copying something that it will not be as good as the first thing that was copied from."
True with Xerox machines, not with living organisms.

-"If everything breakds or dies it then seems that it would be impossible for anything to keep getting better."
Evolution says nothing about getting better. It's about surviving to pass on traits to your offspring. Depending on how you define better--these traits may or may not be better.

-"Everyone knows that you need an original thing in the first place before you can even copy something."
This assumes that living things are always just copies. The fact that they aren't is exactly what evolution explains.

-"The original must have something or someone that created it."
You may believe this if you wish. There's no evidence supporting it.

-"Things just do not come from nothing."
No one, not even atheists, said they did.

2007-12-24 04:42:55 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

1. Evolution is still a theory with many holes in it
2. Evolution and the Bible have the same sequence, just a different time line. If you replace the word "Day" in Genesis with the word "Era" you've got the same system of events that evolution has. You must remember that Genesis was carried by word of mouth for centuries and it was told to people with less than a 1st grade education. There was no need to specify how animals and humans were created, what was carried on and told was the end result.
3. It's not so much worshiping something as it is realizing that there is something bigger than all of us out there. That there is a source of positive energy that we draw from and this source wants us to spread positive energy (Love, Peace, etc.) to everyone and fill the world with it instead of the negative energy that we get from the road most often traveled.
Just because we can't see or toutch something doesn't mean it's not real. And in that same way, study religion, dig deep into your heart and open it at least for a moment to the possibility of God and you will be able to see and toutch God in things you do everyday. You'll realize that a stormy day is not a misserable day, it is a wonderful day for the crops and our water supply and that getting a smaller pay check is not bad, it teaches you to appreciate what you have and what the nessecities are in life instead of filling yourself with material things that only let you down.
5. Copying something is the opposite of what your looking at. We are a being that learns what our parents know by the age of 18 then we are off to fill our minds with more. If we all taught our kids all of our life lessons by 18, each generation would grow smarter and smarter

2007-12-24 04:23:18 · answer #3 · answered by HC Johnson 2 · 0 0

Well the religious believe God came from nothing and he created the world from nothing, so EVERYONE believes nothing came from nothing. Creatures are constantly evolving, every time influenza comes around the globe it has changed. I accept that most cultures need to have a religious or spiritual form of expression, I am agnostic with a liking for Buddhism, my spiritual side is expressed through art. Logic, learning and reason have convinced me that the world is extremely old and that life has evolved and is evolving still. Furthermore I am of the opinion that within my children's lifetime we will create machine intelligence and find evidence for life on other planets and learn how to extend our lives. Unless religous dogma can also adapt it will became destructive. Recent evolutionary science has gone some way to explain worship as an adaptation that is helpful for groups. If they believe in each other and a god and the rightness of their cause, they cooperate more and fight better. Religion seems to confer survival benefits, that's why it is widespread, but just like the urge to eat or have sex, it needs to be kept in check otherwise it becomes a destructive indulgence.

2007-12-24 04:37:31 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

There are a pair of theories at the back of this, yet something like countless regression in reality says "it is so far lower back we don't be responsive to and could no longer be responsive to." ideally, we don't be responsive to what started out evolution. yet this could desire to be examined greater heavily between micro and macro evolution. Macro evolution remains very particularly contested, and a lot of question its validity interior the sector of biology. Micro evolution is all approximately adaptaion to stay to tell the story. Necessity is the mummy of invention...nonetheless it may look that plenty it rather is mentioned in micro evolution is organic risk, no longer necessity. the two way, survival could be a stable motivator for adapability. it rather is in basic terms slightly of twisted logic, supplies are constrained so indirectly a mutation takes place which ingredients one creature a greater robust area over others (micro evolution)...finally those mutations will grow to be so great that there is an entire new species (macro evolution). yet there looks to need a employing rigidity, for the reason that count unearths its lowest sturdy point of potential, why could it try to compete? what's the rigidity? of course technological know-how Fiction does factor out that radiation can mutate lizards into horribly super hearth respiratory beasts.

2016-10-02 07:43:57 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Normally, I would take the time to thoroughly break down your question and address each of its points, but I'm REALLY lazy right now and I'm trying to sing along with some Mindless Self Indulgence.

So, I'll just say this: based on your details, you clearly don't even have a weak grasp of the basic concepts of evolution. And to answer your "worship" question, man evolved to think abstractly and be able to generalize thus giving him/her the ability to question existence itself. The questions "Who put us here," "Who made the sky," "What is the purpose of life," etc, automatically presume that there is a "who" or that there is an objective purpose to life. So, even though we were intelligent enough to wonder, we weren't intelligent enough to answer.

Now we are. Well, most of us.

2007-12-24 04:35:10 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

I READ that scientists base their theory on the fact the first cell was created by CHANCE!!! That's just like saying we left 100 bricks and millions of years later,we come back and find a house. WTF????
Evolution is false.
if anything,there is only mutations,to a certain extent. Some say that some animals that dont live in water,kept going so far in the water to get food,that they became able to live in the water. So,are they saying that if humans start going deep in the water we would become mermaids and/or mermen? O.O
But what do I know?im only in 9th grade. :D

2007-12-25 07:16:14 · answer #7 · answered by taw 2 · 1 0

In Darwin's "Origin of Species", some elements of evolution are true. However, the complexity of Man kind clearly shows that we did not evolve from apes and monkeys. The evolutionary jump from them to us is just too great. We were created by God all at once just as we are today.

2007-12-24 04:22:33 · answer #8 · answered by CrG 6 · 1 1

Everything WITHIN the spacetime envelope evolves. But evolution is incomplete without a Godlike Being to skew those incredibly poor odds into something that can actually happen.

2007-12-24 04:24:23 · answer #9 · answered by Michelle C 4 · 1 0

None of what you say necessarily follows from a belief in the vercity of Darwin's theory of evolution. There are Christians who believe that evolution is one of the techniques God used to create the world, so it is entirely possible to believe in God and still accept the validity of evolution.

2007-12-24 04:35:43 · answer #10 · answered by Pamela J 6 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers