I think it's wonderful, don't you?
2007-12-23 19:32:38 · 10 answers · asked by ? 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
energeticthinker: yeah I seem to remember something about the Shah being our puppet or something. High school was such a haze through all the pot smoke I'm surprised that I can even remember how to type. Anyways, I was refering to after this next invasion.
2007-12-23 19:46:17 · update #1
by zahid any large scale attack against the U.S. will probably be the first, followed by the last attack in the last war in human history.
2007-12-24 02:57:25 · update #2
I think it sucks that we played around and made it take this long. Should have annexed the place on day one.
2007-12-23 23:26:55 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
The issues that Obama is spending on replaced into set into action nicely earlier he have been given into workplace. I do agree that because of the fact he's changing and suggesting exchange of united states of america of america that people view it as volatile. maximum exchange is, fairly in a rustic that has no longer replaced plenty interior the final one hundred years. the U. S. is the bedrock with a view to chat, yet as interior the flintstones. at the back of in an astounding many techniques. exchange would be extremely volatile whether it fairly is needed, no rely what celebration is in workplace. The rigidity has come by using financial soften down and scarcity of financial duty that the U. S. has had for the previous 2 an prolonged time. The politically volatile section... i do no longer think of its honest to rank the U. S. in with honduras or Iran, however the skizm between precise and left is widening... i did no longer answer a query because of the fact i did no longer see one, yet there are some comments.
2016-11-24 22:18:49 · answer #2 · answered by saylors 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Since the only people pushing a war with Iran are Democrats, to me it is more of an incentive to work to keep them out of power.
2007-12-24 08:13:16 · answer #3 · answered by smsmith500 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Once again a fine example of the standard of geographical knowledge (or lack of it) by a 'red-neck'.
Not only that, you, the US of A could not colonize your own **** house, yet alone a nation!
I slightly admire you for attempting to follow in the footsteps of Great Britain in their successful colonization of nations, however I am afraid to say you lack the tact, intelligence, diplomacy and humanity to emmulate such achievements.
Nice try!
2007-12-23 20:34:37 · answer #4 · answered by General Guru Master 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Be proud ,
But get a forecast ,
US attack on Iran will be "The USA's last attack in US History" ,
Have a doubt ? Try it .
2007-12-23 20:45:14 · answer #5 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋
You are mistaken.
We tried to do that, by overthrowing their democratic, pro-western government in the 1950s...which lead to the Islamic Revolution.
They aren't going to make that mistake again: letting the U.S. try to take them over. I have no doubt that they have learned their lesson; unfortunately, knee-jerk U.S. nationalist with little knowledge about effective foreign policy have not.
Good day to you. May you become well read.
:-)
2007-12-23 19:42:07 · answer #6 · answered by energeticthinker 5 · 2⤊ 4⤋
I sure hope this "question" was just a pathetic attempt at sarcasm and humor.
2007-12-23 20:06:41 · answer #7 · answered by Left Hand Black 5 · 4⤊ 0⤋
We have colonies in Asia?!! Sweet!!
2007-12-23 20:11:46 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Do you think if you lick the feet of terrorists they'll play nice? What I'm most proud of is that terrorists laugh at America's uneducated toe-lickers.
2007-12-23 19:39:54 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 4⤋
Mighty powers have collapsed in the world with arrogant behaviour. USA doomed to fall in that category is imminent.
2007-12-23 19:55:46 · answer #10 · answered by katkam v 3 · 2⤊ 5⤋