Which current american political party would Hitler have felt most comfortable with and why?

Question

surely no american party matches 100% all of Hitler's views, but which one Hitler prefer as it stands for many of the same principles he did as far as actions are concerned.

Please give the details to back up your opinion.

Answer 1

NAZI is a german phonetic abbreviation for National Sozialist German Workers Party.

Fascism is a socialist system with the illusion of property rights [as Hitler argued... "it doesn't matter who owns something... it only matters who controls it"] ... as opposed to communist socialism where there are no property rights.

Hitler said that germany must be rid of capitalism, religion, and jews.

The radical left in america [the progressive columnists and write-ins, the nation columnists and write-ins, air america anchors and guests, christophor hitchens, howard zinn, noam chomsky, michael moore, ... , etc.] essentially says, "america must be rid of capitalism, religion, and christians.

Mikhail Gorbachev coined the term "The Third Way" as a name for a proposal to attempt to save communist socialism... though the third way proposal was essentially fascist socialism.

Bill Clinton at the Detroit Economic Club said [ trying to sound like Roosevelt ] " my fellow americans we have found a third way.
http://www.agitprop.org.au/stopnato/19990520thirdway.php

Barak Obama speaks of the third way in his book.

Howard Dean, George Soros, and the DNC are promoting
George Lakoffs book " don't think of an elephant" which in my mind reads like a modern mein kamph... implies the third way in that it says we [they] must take corporations under stake holder control which fascism does... where the state is the substitute for the board of directors as the nazi party controlled Schindlers business in the true movie Schindlers List.

Rabbi Michail Lehner's book [Hillary Clintons politics of meaning guru] " the left hand of God" were he proposes an even more draconian shift to the radical left

The political terms Left and Right come from the french revolution where the jacobin socialist radicals who were fighting for radical draconian change and instigating a revolution sat on the left side of the national assembly... while those who opposed the radicals intentions for radical change sat on the right side of the national assemby. Thats why marxists call anyone who opposes they're struggle for revolution as rightwing reactionaries.

In response to the reign of terror in the french revolution, some polemics of the time attempted to concieve a method of governance that would reduce the likelyhood of a repeat of the blood letting of the reign of terror from occuring again... hense the beginning of the conservative movement which argued for a form of governance that embraced gradual change [as opposed to radical draconian change] with an ardent respect for the law of unintended consequences, which involved sticking to the tried and true while tweeked the form of governance over time to accommodate for changing times.

Now I ask... who if anyone was Hitler and Mossolini reacting against? They were both ardent socialists beligerantly fighting for the socialist cause [though apposed to communist style socialism] and in no way in the most remote sense were interested in sticking to the tried and true.

The answer to your question is... Hitler [ and Mossolini] would no dought join up with the neoprogressives who took over the democratic party and kicked the classic liberals out [ except for Lieberman who they tried and failed to kick out].

The classic liberals attempting to regain some political power went into and took over the republican party [bringing their big spending habits with them].

The neoprogressives [James Carvel in particular] called the classic liberals that went over to the republican party "neocons"... while kinder polemics called them Reagan Democrats.

That political exodus was poigniantly emphasized when Reagan answered the question "why did you change parties" and he replied " I didn't change parties... my party changed"

The neoprogressives are carrying the baton for their socialist predecessors who were the radical leftwing of the demoratic party ... some of whom chanted "why not peace with Hitler... Hitler didn't attack us"... and some of whom affectionately referred to Stalin as a "Uncle Joe"... and Stalin condescendingly referred to them as "Useful Idiots".

During the last presidential election an east coast school [I don't recall the name of the school] held a moch election inwhich they only disclosed the politician's political platform [with no name attached] and Hitler won.

That moch election outcome establishes that Hitler's message would be received by accepting hears and minds in this country that have been effectively indoctrinated [I believe by neoprogressive teachers] to receive it... which indicates an ominous parallel to Hitlers youth.

Again... Hitler [and Mossolini] would be in the neoprogressive socialist movement in this country with its direct ties to socialist internationale activist groups all around the world.

Neoprogressive socialist rhetoric in there own words... class war of the haves and the have nots... the third way... bring evil corporations under stake-holder control... political correctness... speech codes... identity politics... politics of personal distruction... fairness doctrine... socialized healthcare... fair enterprize not free enterprize... fair trade not free trade... christian bashing... Isreal and jew bashing...

Of course your all outraged... totally p-st... and completely unhindged [wailing and nashing of the teeth in front of the computer screen]...because the truth aways hurts [though it can set (or keep} you free if you recognize it].

The overwhelming majority of citizens of nazi germany didn't recognize the distopian path they were on. Their relavance filters were disabled by the hysteria of the moment and collectivist group think.

The german mind was conditioned through propaganda recieved from marxist academics promoting the philosophies of Plato, Hegel, Kant, Nietzsche, Marx, ... , etc.. All of whom are the progenitors of modern statism and totalitarianism.

There were Ph.D.s manning the ovens in nazi germany.

Eqalitarian humanism is the distopian movement that links all the dictators of modern times [Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, Castro, ... , etc.].

Hitler was a humanist [as Goebbel promoted him as] .

Stalin was seen by humanists of that time as the one who would finally bring humanism to its truest and fullest potential.

American humanists affectionately referred to Stalin as Uncle Joe.

The utopian [Faustian] fallacy of egalitarian humanism is that egalitarian equality dialectically contradicts the very idea of liberty in which one is permitted to live ones life though ones own volition. Well... here the catch... allowing individuals to live their lives through their own volition over time results in inequality, because every society is composed of a mix of Doers, Just-Get-By-ers, and Non-Doers.

The religion of socialist utopianism is a dilusion because... when one takes away personal private reward, most everyone fights for the easiest job [work]. Which is the reason voluntary socialism doesn't work... and therefore why socialism requires the coersive power of the state to pursue its distopian dilusions.

The vise of capitalism is its unequal distribution of blessings... the virtue of socialism is its equal distribution of misery! [Winston Churchill]... [not Ward Churchill you koolaid drinking bloats].

Yes... the eqalitarian humanist class war of the Haves and the Have-Nots is a hoodwinking obfuscation of the real truth... that its not the Haves and the Have-Nots [as all of the current democratic (neoprogressive socialist) candidates are saying]... but rather its the Doers and the Non-Doers. Hurts don't it. See a real therapist... not Dr. Phil or Oprah.

Your all buying into the madness of the distopian path we're on because you've all been hoodwinked by drinking the koolaid served to you by revisionist marxist academic bloats such as Howard Zinn and Noam Choamsky [and thousands others] who have very effectively carried out the socialist reeducation [camp] aphorism, " If you can't get away with rewriting history... don't teach it ... and will indoctrinate the next generation"]

Of course you violently disagree with me like any wrong minded good socialist [subjectively programmed] would do.

The plabean masses caught up in the subjective hysteria of group think [collectivism] of the moment seldom see the warning signs .

All truth passes throught three stages. First , it is ridiculed... Second, it is violently opposed... and Third, it is accepted as selt-evident [Arthur Schopenhaur].

Now go get those bourgeois capitalist pigs [that are exploiting the proletariat masses] along with your fellow commrads in arms like a good little obediant socialist.

P.S. Hitler promoted himself through the national sozialist
german workers party as voice of the lower class against the money changers and the german industrial capitalist... who Hitler [NAZIS] said were controlled by Jews and were ruining germany. Sound familiar? Go have some wine and crackers-n-cheeze with an ardent neoprogressive and be patient... he or she will eventually spill all the beans and splain it to ya cloaked within the most alarming conspiracy plots that are being carried out against you and this country... Starting with our government was behind 9/11 on infinitum.

As to the religion of humanism [it is a religion] which states that man is the measure of all things...

The moment man becomes the meaning and measure of all things... will be the moment man looses his humanity.

Those who burn books [revisionists rewriting history]... will burn people. [politics of personal distruction]

THIRD WAY or THIRD REICH
http://www.agitprop.org.au/stopnato/19990520thirdway.php


e7.2521

Answer 2

Hitler would not have felt comfortable with any political party. He did not believe in sharing power or ideas and in his egotistical-mania, even those closest to him were easily eliminated should they fail to follow the rules that he alone created. The details are forever etched in history for your review.

Answer 3

every one knows that the winner always writes the history of said war and its surroundings, so don't believe every thing you read in history, history in the beginning was HIS STORY it was shortened to history but, it is still the same old his story, and he will tell his story the way he wants you to believe it,
I would bet most of you were not even a glint in your daddy's eye when Hitler was around, but, I was around before Hitler ever hit the news papers, so I feel I know a little more than you rookies, my dad was a photographer before and during ww11 he was in Germany with the tank corps under Patton, and I have listened to many story's he had, and he was amazed at the story's printed during and after the war, things that pertained to Hitler and Germany, such as the holo Caust, he was there so was a uncle but neither heard any thing about any death camps or holo caust until 6 months after the war, and since Patton was first into Germany and into Poland , how could something this big have been hidden from them?? after all they even gave food to lots of Germans and Poles who were starving, and it would seem their men would have covered damned near every inch of any area they took, it definately makes me wonder just how much of this B.S. is true or how muched was staged, I do know that the storys have changed over time drastically and theoriginal storys have been proven to have been a impossibility, also plese search for the investigation did on the holo caust shotrtly after WW11 by some scientist from univ, of so, cal at Berkley and a team from Versaills univ, of Versaills france, you may have some serious doubts also,
also, most of our politicians would give their front seat in hell if they could do what Hitler did,
Germany was dead starvation and homeless and a sense of helplesness,was abound in Germany, because the Zionist was trying to destroy the German people so they could have Germany as a homeland they had tried thesame thing in England before , but the English Parliment kicked them out before they gained any real strength, so they went to Germany. there they were successful same in Russia wherethey kept the people under slavery for over 70 years, why don't you people read your history instead of listening to your Zionist owned medias, Hitler, took Germanyand within 10 years made them into a force to be reckoned with, plenty of food for all of the people etc, do we have anyone with those capibilities today??it don't matter if you like Hitler or not but, give the devil his due,

my spell check don't work

Answer 4

Neither one. Hitler believed in 2 things, himself and the manipulation of others for power. That's a personal trait, not a trait of either political party. There are people in both parties now that try to manipulate and gain power, but that doesn't mean the parties themselves are that way.

Answer 5

(In reply to the first answer) - I find it very hard to believe that both Hitler and Stalin would agree on the same party, given that they occupied extreme opposite ends of the political spectrum. I find it harder to believe that that party would be the dmeocrats, especially for Hitler, who was socially conservative and authoritarian - you can hardly call a guy who executed homsexuals "progressive".

Answer 6

In my view the Democratic party is the one Hitler would be most at home with. In both the last elections Democrats used intimidation and storm trooper tactics to push their agenda.

Answer 7

The party that wants the government to control the population ; universal this and universal that !!

Answer 8

Democrats Hitler supported Government control of welfare, name calling and jail time for political opponents.

Answer 9

this is the real answer:

First we must examine impartially what Hitler stood for. Then we must compare what he stood for and ask ourselves which party comes closest to those ideals.

http://www.ellensplace.net/fascism.html

the answer is obviously republicans.

Even the republicans know this. Like the guy above me who says its the democrats, he knows he is telling a fib, but thats what fascists do.

Answer 10

The party of one.Didn't you know that?He died by his own hand,that should tell you something.

Answer 11

the American Nazi Party.......yes there is such a thing