English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2_KEWUU33Lg&feature=related

Within 18 seconds of this video she admits it was her husband's tenancy (the past decade) that "the intelligence" was built. This after Bill downsized the C.I.A. and the military in order to "balance the budget".

And now look at her POLITICAL statements. She is in it for her own political gain ..... not the TRUE interets of the country.

2007-12-23 14:32:50 · 6 answers · asked by George 3 in Politics & Government Politics

6 answers

Clinton raped the interns and then the military for the "peace dividend". After "right sizing" the military and ignoring all the terrorist on his watch (the first World Trading Center bombing, the assignation attempt on GW 41, The Cole bombing, the Kobar Towers bombing, the embassy bombings, and being offered Osama Bin Ladin on a platter by the Sudanese, he turned them down because it would have cut into his intern molesting time.

2007-12-23 14:47:55 · answer #1 · answered by MSG 4 · 2 1

purely wanted to thank you for some thought scary information. certainly hypocrisy, yet he's no longer the 1st and heavily isn't the final baby-kisser to chat out of the two aspects of his mouth. the priority nevertheless- might or no longer it fairly is extra effectual if he did no longer something in any respect? it fairly is like people who say that Oprah Winfrey does what she does while you evaluate it fairly is a tax write-off. nicely, even whether it fairly is, how many hundreds of thousands of people are taking advantage of her philanthropy? might or no longer it fairly is extra effectual if she did no longer something? people's strikes can consistently be judged. The question is, are we keen to place those judgments aside if society is ultimately the beneficiary?

2016-11-24 21:54:25 · answer #2 · answered by schiavone 4 · 0 0

It is merely an example, the epitome of hypocricy goes to Bush "We have to go to war with the army we have." Then what the hell is all that money going towards?

2007-12-23 14:39:11 · answer #3 · answered by Experto Credo 7 · 2 3

Look, one Bush, two Clinton, two Bush, so next is one Clinton. Accept it and let's just get thru it. See ya in 2012 (if anyone is left alive by then.)

2007-12-23 14:46:51 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 4

If you don't like her, don't vote for her. I can't believe you think you have a chance to sway anyone's opinion here. Everyone else here is either too young to vote, or are here to promote their preferred candidate.

2007-12-23 14:36:24 · answer #5 · answered by Sordenhiemer 7 · 2 3

Neither is Bushco.

2007-12-23 14:35:40 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

fedest.com, questions and answers