Iowa - caucusing for Kucinich, but he won't have 15% viability at the caucus, so second choice is Obama.
2007-12-26 18:04:27
·
answer #1
·
answered by dc87 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Iowa, New Hampshire, and South Carolina had special permission. If they hadn't been granted that permission then they would have been penalized just as MI and FL. The reality is, no one probably asked for special permission for those states to hold their primaries. The states moved them up without first getting approval.
2016-05-26 01:59:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
South Carolina voter!
I really can't tell you... I'm still thinking about the candidates, and who knows, if I choose a person now he or she may have dropped out by the time we vote.
Under no circumstances will I vote for Ron Paul. He may be a hell of a doctor but he is naive about the way the world works. He proved it on Meet The Press this morning:
*****
MR. RUSSERT: But, but you eliminate the income tax, do you know how much lost revenue that would be?
REP. PAUL: A lot. But...
MR. RUSSERT: Over a trillion dollars.
REP. PAUL: That's good.
MR. RUSSERT: Would you replace the income tax with anything else?
REP. PAUL: Not if I could help it.
MR. RUSSERT: But if you had a flat tax, 30 percent consumption tax, that would be very, very punishing to the poor and middle class.
REP. PAUL: Well, I know. That's why I don't want it.
MR. RUSSERT: So you have nothing?
REP. PAUL: I want to cut spending. I want to get a--use the Constitution as our guide, and you wouldn't need the income tax.
****
MR. RUSSERT: So if Iran invaded Israel, what do we do?
REP. PAUL: Well, they're not going to. That is like saying "Iran is about to invade Mars."
******
MR. RUSSERT: The government of Israel wants us to bomb Iran?
REP. PAUL: I, I don't think there's a doubt about that, that they've encouraged us to do that.
*****
REP. PAUL: You got it completely wrong. I've never voted for an earmark in my life.
MR. RUSSERT: No, but you put them in the bill.
REP. PAUL: I put it in because I represent people who are asking for some of their money back. But it doesn't cut any spending to vote against an earmark. And the Congress has the responsibility to spend the money. Why leave the money in the executive branch and let them spend the money?
MR. RUSSERT: Well, that's like, that's like saying you voted for it before you voted against it.
REP. PAUL: Nah! Come on, Tim. That has nothing to do with that.
MR. RUSSERT: If, if, if you put it in the bill and get the headlight back home...
REP. PAUL: No, I, I make the request. They're not in the bills.
MR. RUSSERT: ...and then you, then you know it's going to pass Congress and so you, you don't refuse the money.
REP. PAUL: Well, no, of course not. It's like taking a tax credit.
******
MR. RUSSERT: Let me ask this. Term limits. You ran on term limits. "I think we should have term limits for our elected leaders." You've been in Congress 18 years.
REP. PAUL: But I never ran on voluntary term limits. There's a big difference. I didn't sign a pledge for a voluntary term limit.
****
By his own words, Ron Paul is both a liar and a thief.
2007-12-23 15:02:40
·
answer #3
·
answered by another_guy_named_steve 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
Nevada ~ Joe Biden
2007-12-25 19:56:08
·
answer #4
·
answered by EnberWolfe 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Michigan-Ron Paul.
2007-12-23 14:08:54
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋
Iowa. Ron Paul.
2007-12-23 13:30:24
·
answer #6
·
answered by Big Bear 7
·
4⤊
5⤋
Michigan- Ron Paul
2007-12-23 13:29:45
·
answer #7
·
answered by Elutherian 4
·
4⤊
6⤋
I don't vote in Iowa, I caucus.
First perference group is Duncan Hunter. Once his group is declared "not viable", meaning it has less than 15% of the voters, my second preference group will be Mike Huckabee.
2007-12-23 14:26:28
·
answer #8
·
answered by Jam_Til_Impact 5
·
0⤊
5⤋
Ohio-Ron Paul
2007-12-23 13:33:50
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
5⤋
Iowa -- I'm a Precinct Captain for Hillary in the Caucuses.
2007-12-23 13:33:47
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
6⤋