Who thinks Oj simpson was guilty.?

Question

who thinks Oj Simpson was guilty of murder. please give a reason why.

in my opinion i think OJ IS NOT GUILTY. It hink this because the timeline of the murders is way off. they said the murders happened between 10:15-10:30. based on kato the dog barking. but several people including nicoles neihbor across the street says she was outside talking to her neighbor from 10:20-10:35 . she said when she went inside and brushed her teeth she heard the dog barking. it was 10:45. Oj was home. by then. another reason is hes old theres know way he could kill two pppl. let alone ron goldman who i might add worked out.

THE ONLY REASON EVERYONE THINKS HES GUILTY IS BECAUSE EVERYONE IN THE WORLD IS OUT TO PROVE SOMONE OR SOMETHING WRONG.

Answer 1

well, I'll start with the fact that his bloody fingerprints were on coins he dropped beside her gate while fumbling in his pockets for his keys, um... let's see - the bloody fingerprint on the gate latch, his hair inside the cap the killer wore which was left at the crime scene, the blood on his car door handle, the fact that there was SO MUCH blood evidence against him. If he didn't do it, who did?

There was absolutely NO evidence that pointed to anyone else. Bloody fingerprints don't just appear? It means OJ's hands were in their blood

There is so much evidence against him - its endless. The reason OJ got off with murder is because of the fact that Mark Furhman, one of the detectives had in the past said the word n***er. When the black jury heard that tape, their minds were made up - they didn't care and they set him free.

I hardly think the timeline being off by a few minutes from several different witnesses is evidence that he didn't do it.
When they say what time it was, it was an estimate. For instance, Kato I'm sure didn't hear the dog barking and look straight at the clock - same thing with the neighbors. If you can give me something more concrete than blood evidence, I'm willing to listen.

BTW - have you read the book OJ wrote yet?? When telling about that night, he recalls specific memories that only someone that was there could remember. Have a look at these links - you'll get some more info about the book and about the people that prosecuted him - these shows are recent

http://drphil.com/shows/show/951/

http://www.oprah.com/tows/slide/200602/20060209/slide_20060209_284_202.jhtml

I have read SEVERAL books about this case, watched the trial, and read the book OJ wrote. There is no way IMO that he couldn't have done it.

Answer 2

If the detectives had not been so ******* racist and out to hang a celeb., they would have obtained a search warrant that is required by law, to enter the home of a suspect and search, plus remove evidence.

I am very much into crime & spy movies, and never in my life have I seen or read a case where the entire legal system, including the forensic team screwed up a case that allowed a murderer to walk being found "not guilty". (Why do you think they all quit their jobs and went into something else??).

I always believed that Oj, and his son committed the crime together.

When the verdict came down, to this day I remember being on duty in a hospital (will not name), where a full scale riot broke out between the white doctors and the black doctors. (I am talking an actual fist fight). The majority of black people felt he was not quilty and the majority of white people felt he was quality.

My own personal opinion every person that had a hand in the proseution of Oj, Simson should be charged with first degree murder X 2 for failing to do the job that they took and were paid to perform. Because of these ********, two people are dead and Oj, enjoys life being a free man.

Minddoctor, France

Answer 3

Absolutely. Like everyone else I was floored when those idiots on the jury came back with a not guilty verdict. I hope they're all ashamed of themselves. The families got a civil judgment against him and he has yet to pay a penny to them. I feel really bad for the families of the victims. Not only were their loved ones terribly murdered but then the killer gets off and now seems to be thumbing his nose at them. OJ's living it up with his days on the golf course and his nights in clubs getting lap dances from cheap sluts.

Answer 4

I think he is guilty because I watched a lot of the trial and saw the evidence presented. Their blood was inside his car for God's sake. I know it's messed up, but I was pulling for him even though I figured he was guilty.

Wasn't this about 13 years ago?

Answer 5

Of course he was guilty. The evidence proved it.

Interesting side note the LAPD considers the case closed. They know they found the murderer and have no reason to look anymore.

Answer 6

One jury said he wasn't guilty of the crime, another found him to be liable for those murders in a civil action.
But ask yourself, does it really matter?

Answer 7

He was found guilty of the civil trail because they found out that he as wearing the shoes of the killer tracts that we're found in the shoe prints traced with blood he denies that he ever wore the shoes but when they found pictures of him wearing them he was at a loss for words. Big time evidence

Answer 8

Who else would kill Nicole? really?

Answer 9

the man is guilty, why were his bloody fingerprints everywhere if he isnt guilty

Answer 10

yes i think he is, because of his actions and how he wrote a book saying if he did do it which ment he did do it