2007-12-23 12:18:46 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xBGadsd_lG0
2007-12-23 12:23:16 · update #1
What is your point. The oldest brother died before he could do anything. The second brother became president but achieved very little and nearly got us into a real war over Cuba. The third brother was never able to capture the top spot and seemed to have promise, but we'll never know. The fourth brother is a womanizing, drunk who got away with causing the death of a young woman.
Yes, a possible promising future but one that never came to pass. They seemed to be totally in the image of their father.
2007-12-23 12:48:44 · answer #1 · answered by Randy 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The Kennedy's are dead, and dead issues. If it were not for their father, they would have never had any play in politics. That era is passed and the Clintons believe they are the continuance of that breed; and that breed was never going to really make a difference in this country if they had even had the chance, and I respected JFK for his involvement with MLK, but not the involvement of Margaret Sanger who wanted to race cleanse by virtue of the use of abortion.
We should never attempt to rekindle a dream as they had, it does not work, and especially when it was not meant to do anything but to march with the idea of freeing those who were oppressed, whereas those who were oppressed are not today. We should look forward to the problems we have now, and just to move on - like getting out of Iraq, not going into another war anywhere, and to regenerate our economy.
2007-12-23 21:06:01 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
They are who we thought they were! Randy Irish lads who could party party hardy!
2007-12-23 20:34:30 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋