EGYPT
The tomb, which lies in an area that was not normally used for royal burials in the Valley center, was apparently quickly buried deep below the surface of the Valley of the Kings on the West Bank at Luxor (ancient Thebes). It was forgotten about until Howard Carter discovered it on November 4th, 1922. Part of Howard Carter's luck was that it was not discovered earlier when, his predecessor in the Valley, Theodore Davis who was American, came within little more then a meter of finding it himself.
It is not the grandest tomb in Egypt, and was certainly not occupied by one of Egypt's most powerful rulers. But in general, the population of the world know the tomb of Tutankhamen (KV 62) better then any other, because of all the royal tombs, it was found mostly intact. What was found in this tomb surely gives us pause to understand the motive behind ancient tomb robberies. If such a vast fortune in treasure (in all, some 3,500 items were recovered) was found in this tiny tomb owned by a relatively minor king, what must have dazzled the eyes of the thieves who first entered the huge tomb of Ramesses II, or one of Egypt's other grand kings? Of course, the list of funerary equipment was very useful to Egyptologists, giving them an idea of what had been removed from other royal tombs.
The Valley of the Kings is a valley in Egypt where for a period of nearly 500 years from the 16th to 11th century BC, tombs were constructed for the kings and powerful nobles of the New Kingdom (the Eighteenth through Twentieth Dynasties of Ancient Egypt).[2][3] The valley stands on the west bank of the Nile, across from Thebes (modern Luxor), within the heart of the Theban Necropolis. The wadi consists of two valleys, East Valley (where the majority of the royal tombs situated) and West Valley.
The area has been a focus of concentrated archaeological and egyptological exploration since the end of the eighteenth century, and its tombs and burials continue to stimulate research and interest. In modern times the valley has become famous for the discovery of the tomb of Tutankhamun (with its rumours of the Curse of the Pharaohs), and is one of the most famous archaeological sites in the world. In 1979, it became a World Heritage Site, along with the rest of the Theban Necropolis.
The Valley was used for primary burials from approximately 1539 BC to 1075 BC, and contains some 60 tombs, starting with Thutmose I and ending with Ramesses X or XI.
The Valley of the Kings also had tombs for the favourite nobles and the wives and children of both the nobles and pharaohs. Around the time of Ramesses I (ca. 1300 BC) the Valley of the Queens was begun, although some wives were still buried with their husbands.
The quality of the rock in the Valley is very inconsistent. Tombs were built, by cutting through various layers of limestone, each with its own quality. This poses problems for modern day conservators, as it must have to the original architects. Building plans were probably changed on account of this. The most serious problem are the shale layers. This fine material expands when it comes into contact with water. This has damaged many tombs, particularly during floods.
HANHOONY
Don't confuse tomb and mummy
A Tomb is a repository for the remains of the dead. The term generally refers to any structurally enclosed interment space or burial chamber
2007-12-23 11:49:30
·
answer #1
·
answered by Shay p 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Tut's final resting place is in Egypt. Specifically in the Valley of the Kings, East Valley, Thebes West Bank, Thebes . It's number KV62 in the tomb identification system.
2007-12-23 12:30:13
·
answer #2
·
answered by icabod 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I visited the Valley of the Kings in the summertime, I entered a number of tombs yet no longer King Tut's via fact his is the only one properly-known to be nevertheless occupied. Egypt relies upon heavily on tourism and the Valley of the Kings is between the precise factors of interest. the rationalization they're giving for the eliminating of his continues to be is that the the tomb and contents are deteriorating rapidly via style of holiday makers, so it relies upon on your standpoint. Mine is, it rather is a grave and could be respected as such, that's why i did no longer enter it, others could desire to argue that they have got the main suitable to make certain those wonders themselves.
2016-10-09 03:01:26
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Shay is right. And if you don't know that from the get-go, you really need to do some research girl. Google it!
2007-12-23 11:54:24
·
answer #4
·
answered by texasjewboy12 6
·
0⤊
0⤋