Any Republican - they've done enough damage already!
Also, exactly the opposite of what "Fat Pizza" said.
2007-12-23 10:27:05
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
11⤊
8⤋
Hillary Clinton. She's an insider, which is exactly what we DON'T need right now. I'm an Independent, have leaned to Democrats in presidential elections, but there's NO WAY I will every vote for a Clinton or Bush....PERIOD.
Do you really want the SAME people back in the White House?
Hillary is the MOST polarizing figure in politics today. If she becomes president, we'll be back at square one with Democrats vs. Republicans. Half the country will love her, half the country will hate her, and I'm sure that's how politicians really want it. As long as they're split down the middle, there's no way anything will truly get accomplished that actually benefits the middle class.
As of now, I'm voting for Obama, because out of all of the candidates who seem to have a chance, he has the freshest and clearest view of the US and world affairs, plus he's not an insider. There's a reason why Obama has climbed in the polls in these states where American citizens get to meet the candidates face to face more often and get to really know them.
Obama may not have experience, but do you really think every president makes every decision without any help? Every president will have an entire cabinet with them, including a vice president. I believe he will surround himself with those who will look at EVERY side to every issue.
However, if Clinton is the Democratic nominee, I'll vote Republican (if it's not Giuliani).
If it's Hillary vs. Giuliani......I'm heading to Canada.
2007-12-25 17:01:48
·
answer #2
·
answered by Dan 2
·
3⤊
0⤋
I've had to put up with unintelligent and incoherent Bush for 7 long and miserable years. At this point, anyone will be an improvement. You can't do worse than Bush, unless you end up spending the next 4 years trying to clean up his mess. That will be a monumental challenge for any candidate, Republican or Democrat. I personally trust McCain the most of any party, but I don't think he can be as effective as someone who is a little younger. Obama definitely has the most charisma and least experience, maybe too much ambition; Hillary definitely can be perhaps the most effective and intelligent if she can manage to unite the nation behind her. I don't trust Romney, he blatently and repeatedly lies if at the very least exaggerates just about everything... not an honest guy for sure. Giuliani is a hypocrite republican... soft on core republican issues and too liberal on other... how can he acuse others of being polarizing when he is more polarizing, unfaithful and more involved in corruption and scandal than any other of the 16 candidates! Personally, I have the up-most respect for spirituality and politics.... but church and politics must be separate always in public life.... so although I like Huckabee, he's not getting my vote... Thompson is lazy. Edward is boring and doesn't really distinguish himself well. I don't believe any of the other candidates have a shot. In my "independent" view the best candidates by far are Clinton, Obama, and McCain... not necessarily in that order. Dark Horse: Ron Paul.
2007-12-23 20:15:57
·
answer #3
·
answered by QuackQuack 2
·
6⤊
3⤋
Hillary Clinton....Because during Bill Clinton's administration, she had a plan that would have given the american people better health coverage for their money, but after receiving more than a million dollars from different corporations that provide medical insurance to us, she took a 180 degrees turn. She has never been true to the American people and I really think she will be a threat to our national security. But in the other hand, to answer which candidate I will vote to make my President, there is no better choice than Dr. Ron Paul, do your research, he got the cure for the cancer that other polititians have injected us thru all these years. Let us make the United States of America a great place to live in, Let Dr. Ron Paul guide us thru the right pass, God bless us all.
2007-12-25 13:09:58
·
answer #4
·
answered by mrfishmanner 2
·
4⤊
0⤋
Hillary Clinton. She does not want the presidency for the benefit of the country or its people. She wants it for her own personal gain, and has demonstrated ever since her husband's first term that she had her sights set on becoming president. She and Bill Clinton have always depended on polls before making any political decisions, and makes the decisions which will best benefit their legacy and personal status, regardless of the consequence to our nation. She is beholden to more special interest groups than any of the other candidates. Accepting money from these groups will certainly mean reciprocation whether or not it is the right decision for the nation. Hillary needs to exit politics and take up knitting and try to Stand by her Man!
2007-12-25 10:05:28
·
answer #5
·
answered by starback_1 1
·
3⤊
0⤋
I think we need an Edwards-Huckabee ticket. All the rest have too many problems. We need Edwards to make the changes because he would be best for the job of change and Huckabee to keep him in tune with how things really are in the real world.
Edwards-Huckabee would be the right ticket. If we can't have them in office together we need to get that big eared fellow in office that ran a few years back that the Republicans scared away with threats to his family. We might need a business man this time around not some joker like normal.
In real business you don't give money away unless there is a return on your investment. Seems that no one understands that anymore. But what do you expect when the guys and gals we put in off ice has more money then they could spend in a life time.
But if we put a poor man in office he would just corrupt as well.
2007-12-25 05:20:21
·
answer #6
·
answered by Don K 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
I don't want to see Hillary Clinton as the next President. I don't think Bill can keep it in his pants. We don't need to go through that nonsense again. Also, i don't think that the free world is ready to have the most power full country in the world have a woman represent it. In this time period of the world most of who we are in conflict with don't respect or value woman as we do. would Iraq, Iran, or any of the Muslim country's do business with us if we elected a Woman the leader of the free world? I also don't think that it helps that i personally don't trust her. If it is true as she has stated that she didn't know that her husband was cheating on her, then in my opinion she's a dumb blond. Should we give the keys to the world to a person who doesn't even know whats going on in her own house?
2007-12-24 15:55:24
·
answer #7
·
answered by Ron S 1
·
4⤊
0⤋
Huckabee and Romney
I feel that both candidates are using their religious convictions to garner attention from conservative voters, and that a Huckabee or Romney administration would move this country closer to a theocracy. Religion needs to be less prevalent in the political process. In fact, I think it should NEVER be mentioned in a political campaign because it seems to distract from the real issues at hand; I, and certainly millions of other Americans could care less where a candidate goes to church, what faith they belong to, or what their religious convictions may be. Rather, I think we vote based on which candidate has the best ideas that will get the country back on track.
There are (unfortunately) "sheeple" who would be easily lead to vote for someone just because they happen to be the same religion, or hold to the same antiquated, mean-spirited ideals that fit into a religious agenda, for example, denying government acceptance of same-sex civil unions to our own adult, tax-paying citizens who contribute as much to society as the rest of us, yet STILL don't have the same rights.
2007-12-26 05:10:59
·
answer #8
·
answered by Technoshaman 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Hillary here is why. we need to fix the mess we created in the Middle East and if Hillary is electedit will never happen you say why I'll tell you. A womanin the Middle East is nothing the leaders of those countries will not talk to her because women are inferior in the Mid East. The will those countries want to sell oil to a country ran by a women I think not. Hillary ran the country once using here husband as her identity thistime she wont be able to pull it off. The most powerful women in t.v. Oprah wont even endorse her what does that tell you (Please no Race card). Then she made the promise to bring the Troops home ladies and Gents you cant do it Iraq is the modern day Korea we are there for many many years to come. You dont have to agree with me but just look at those points
2007-12-26 03:26:34
·
answer #9
·
answered by scott s 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
I think we need to stop paying so much attention to Democrat or Republican, they both are equally "political" and "twisted" at times. We need to start paying more attention to the individual who best suits our needs. There is nothing wrong with someone who is typically Democrat believing in things that a Republican is speaking for.
Personally I don't want to see Clinton win. I feel that people may be in favor of her because of Bill. I also feel this way about Obama. He is getting such a large following and I feel that this is because he has Oprah's name backing him.
Yes I am a Ron Paul supporter.
2007-12-26 02:14:20
·
answer #10
·
answered by kty_weber 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
They're all pretty awful candidates (especially Romney, Biden, and Clinton), but the big prize goes to:
GIULIANI.
While cheating on his second wife with his current wife, he billed the Office of People with Disabilities $10,054 to provide bodyguards for his mistress. He also billed over $400,000 to an agency that provides legal counsel to the poor. And if you're one of those folks who don't give a rip about the poor or disabled, may I remind that those are your tax dollars he took for his own personal use.
He's also pro-abortion and more of a gun-grabber than many of the Democratic candidates (same with Romney).
2007-12-24 13:11:21
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋