if one of us had people outside our homes and wherever we go, we would get a restraining order or something, right????
2007-12-23 07:41:54 · 6 answers · asked by summer 4 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
Ah, the wonderful freedom of the press.
Bunch of scum sucking mutants preying on other peoples misery or sensationalising the mundane lives of celebrities and politicians.
I don't wanna read what the Beckams have delivered, or that Donny Osmond was drunk in a night club (yeah, I know, but you get my point)
So they're professional stalkers. But if you of I hung around outside a celebs house we would soon be arrested.
2007-12-23 07:53:27 · answer #1 · answered by Harry Monk (18 'til I Dry) 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The word stalker is overused and abused by people who use it to describe people who follow them and try to talk to them a lot. As far as the law is concerned (at least in Illinois, although I'm sure most other states as well), a stalker is not a stalker until he/she commits or threatens to commit violence (including sexual assault, restraint, etc.) against the person or the family memers of the person they are obsessed with.
2007-12-23 07:48:59 · answer #2 · answered by Mickey Mouse Spears 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
its all about the money. Its not about whats right. They bring business to a stupid industry so they let it slide.
2007-12-23 07:48:01 · answer #3 · answered by The Exorcist 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because they make millions of dollars.
2007-12-23 07:45:37 · answer #4 · answered by lucy diamond 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
argh i hate the paparazzi!! lol grrrr!
2007-12-23 07:54:25 · answer #5 · answered by Rosie :) 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
because its not considered stalking if u have a camera....really true i heard that somewhere
2007-12-23 07:48:51 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋