2007-12-23 07:19:51 · 14 answers · asked by justice 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I can't stand Kerry, but wanting him to be prosecuted for treason is just as rediculous as wanting Bush prosecuted for war crimes.
2007-12-23 07:35:14 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
You probably voted for bushit didn't you? (Are you old enough to vote? Probably not smart enough that is obvious!) And you probably served as much time in the military as chainy and limberger didn't you? Got your chickenhawk medals on your chest there?
["A nail-shaped or rod-shaped piece with a spiral groove and a slotted or recessed head designed to be inserted into material by rotating"]* you!
* P 1116, Merriam-Webster's Collegiate, 11th edition, middle of the 1st column
2007-12-24 02:39:18 · answer #2 · answered by Sp II Guzzi 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you stupid fool, he fought for the right to speak his peace.it;s his right did you ever serve in the armed forces.if not just shut up.the VIET NAM war was wrong just like the Iraq war is wrong.and i served my country during the VIET NAM war.we were all lied to by the politicians back then and we are being lied to again.if you can;t take the heat then get out of the kitchen.you should be tried for treason for talking about one of our military men who by the way was a POW. you no doubt believe bush and all his lies.good thing there are men like John Kerry who speak up.
2007-12-23 07:47:42 · answer #3 · answered by bigjon5555 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
The best chance would be Vietnam.. however IF he did something treasonous then by US laws they would need at least two witnesses
2007-12-23 07:33:33 · answer #4 · answered by Larry B 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Because he committed no treason...but GWB did, and we are too busy preparing to prosecute him, and Cheney, and Rove, and The rest of the GOP.
2007-12-23 09:14:10 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Lets see some tangible evidence to your accusation!He had a RIGHT to speak out about Vietnam...........because unlike the chicken hawks he actually did serve in Vietnam!
Your second charge is completely bogus because like all the dems in congress he was given distorted intel to get him to vote for it! Besides which if he had voted against it you cons would have been calling him a traitor for not supporting the president !
2007-12-23 07:30:35 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
in congress only one republican is a highly decorated combat veteran - and you all had no problem attacking him as well:
John McCain (R) Arizona - Silver Star, Legion of Merit, Distinguished Flying Cross, Bronze Star, Purple Heart
the rest are all dems - telling really:
Daniel Inouye - (D) Hawaii - Congressional Medal of Honor
James Webb - (D) Virginia - Navy Cross, Silver Star, Bronze Star(2), Purple Heart(2)
John Kerry - (D) Massachusetts - Silver Star, Bronze Star, Purple Heart (3)
John Murtha -(D) Pennsylvania - Bronze Star, Purple Heart(2)
Chuck Rangel -(D) New York - Bronze Star, Purple Heart
Leonard Boswell -(D) - Iowa - Distinguished Flying Cross(2), Bronze Star(2)
those who talk the toughest are the first to wet their pants when bullets start flying
other war heros recently targeted by republican propaganda:
Bob Kerrey-(D) Nebraska - Congressional Medal of Honor
Max Cleland - (D) Georgia - Silver Star, Bronze Star, Purple Heart
2007-12-23 07:27:51 · answer #7 · answered by PD 6 · 4⤊ 3⤋
Same reason why Bushy isn't. Or Vitter or that tap dancer from Iowa. Politicians in the US are Omnipotent (look it up in the dictionary.
2007-12-23 07:31:40 · answer #8 · answered by Mezmarelda 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Because if he were persecuted over Viet Nam, we, his fellow Viet Nam War veterans, would take the likes of you and put you to work making little pebbles out of large boulders with a six-ounce hammer for the next forty years!
2007-12-23 07:30:08 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
Brcause he has money and connections. He met with the North Vietnamese in Paris (wearing his uniform and while still in the service) and called his fellow soldiers war criminals.
2007-12-23 07:39:40 · answer #10 · answered by mnwomen 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋