2007-12-23 07:04:22 · 19 answers · asked by Someone 3 in Sports ➔ Tennis
federer..he's a smart tennis player
2007-12-23 07:07:39 · answer #1 · answered by Notorious DPT 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Federer's forehand
backhand
net game
lob
top spin
smash
drop shots
overhead
spins
he can flatten the balls
footwork
speed
defense to offense
he's an ALL surface player unlike Nadal
Nadal uses mostly top spins
is not an ALL surface player looking at his record in Melbourne and NY and will lose to chokers like James Blake;someone who was in the top 10 and can't even make the semis of a slam!
Nadal doesn't dominate slams the way Federer does and his play suffers soon after Wimbledon!
the day Nadal makes ALL 4 slam finals and wins 3 pit 4 for 2 years straight;then will have that conversation;until then:
Federer>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Nadal!
2007-12-23 15:41:58 · answer #2 · answered by fredy 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Federer
2007-12-24 07:35:14 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Head-to-head, Nadal has the slight edge, but most of his wins over Federer have been on clay, in which Nadal is clearly the best. Overall though, Federer has proven his complete and utter domination of men's tennis, so the correct answer would be Federer is better.
2007-12-23 09:41:36 · answer #4 · answered by Michael N 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
well if you look up their head to head record, absolutely Nadal leading all the way but most of the time nadal win over Federer came only on clay. if you look up the statistics on other court, you can see a clear dominance of Federer over Nadal. and Federer by far more better than nadal
2007-12-24 04:05:26 · answer #5 · answered by Niroshan A 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Federer beats mst players and is ranked number 1 in the world
but the only player that he cannot beat or can sometimes beat
is nadal there is no way in heck that he can beat nadal on clay
2007-12-26 08:16:03 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Roger Federer is a better tennis player. He has won many grand slams more than Nadal.
2007-12-23 10:50:39 · answer #7 · answered by Ify 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
wow. aren't you a bit of an idiot? a fed/nadal match is only competitive on clay (or grass, maybe when the fedex is having a bad day) but other than that, it's fed. nadal has never made it past the quarters for the other two grand slams. you know who is better.
2007-12-23 15:14:08 · answer #8 · answered by shika dapa 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Federer except on clay
2007-12-24 06:14:14 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Federer is by far a superior tennis player
Nadal should only be taken seriously when he wins a grand slam other than the French
Blake is overrated too
2007-12-23 15:33:31 · answer #10 · answered by Reggie 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yo!!!! Someone!!!!
So boring to answer the same thing over and over again.
Dude.....no more of this and Federer rules tennis and just
watch him beat everyone.....enjoy the game and forget asking
who is better.
Nadal is only better on Clay and he is the King of Clay unless
takes his crown from him.
2007-12-23 08:27:02 · answer #11 · answered by JustDoit 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋