No the reason America will lose respect in the middle east if she is elected will be because she is an appeaser just like her domestic partner ( I am no longer referring to them as being married because I view marriage as a joining in love, not political opportunity).
2007-12-23 06:10:23
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Newsflash: "Eastern countries" (a very vague term, but Ill use it nonetheless) have had female leaders before.
America is not first at everything and the feminists may have won women the right to work but they didnt win any more help doing housework from men. Now we're saddled with full time jobs on top of the housework, which most men I see dont help their wives with. Latchkey children too. A victory indeed.
2007-12-23 15:34:08
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't see hilary having a chance as a spokesperson for our nation because you can't just harp on the immediate media issues. All I see from Hilary is rebuttal; she isn't making a claim to her name. I don't know what she stands for.
The next person in office is someone just like the others before. Take a look at the history. He, and is said he, will be white-anglo saxon. He has a solid family base; he has strong financial family wealth, and he displays a sense of leadership skills, not based on the immediate issues, but based on how he performs in front of the camera.
2007-12-23 14:12:03
·
answer #3
·
answered by anaise 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Unfortunately it is something that people should take into consideration when they go and vote. It's sad that other countries don't view women as equals. In this serious time of conflict we need someone that our enemies will sit with and actually listen to. Otherwise we can look forward to more war, the only thing that will stop the violence is talking.
2007-12-23 14:38:04
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Who is "Hiliary Clinton"? Anyway, has Condoleezza Rice brought American to her knees with the Eastern countries who don't respect women in power? What about former UK prime minister Margaret Thatcher?
2007-12-23 14:10:16
·
answer #5
·
answered by Eirik H 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
You don't think so?
Oh, well then.
The fact that, in international diplomacy, people's personal feelings are irrelevant, and countries have to deal with the heads of state of other countries as representatives of their country -- in short, reality -- is completely irrelevant to what YOU think.
Too bad. If you had any interest in or respect for reality, your what you think might have some meaning or significance.
The problem with Hilary is NOT that her genitalia are outside her body.
No one with more than one functioning brain cell cares about that, and foreign leaders deal with whoever is in charge. (Germany's leader, for instance, is female. Middle Easterns countries don't refuse to deal with Germany on those grounds.)
The problem with Hilary, as far as being president, is the fact that she's corporate-owned. If you'd made that your argument, rather than inventing completely bogus reasons, you might be worth listening to.
I prefer Obama to Clinton. But then, I prefer Edwards to Obama.
2007-12-23 15:38:49
·
answer #6
·
answered by tehabwa 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
With this kind of logic, a woman will never be president and it is no excuse for not electing the best person. Never mind that many countries successfully have female leaders.
And I hate Hillary Clinton!!! But this is not the reason not to vote for her.
2007-12-23 14:10:15
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
there are a lot of women in office in Eastern countries, so I think she will get a lot more respect than old Bush is getting I think the whole world hates Geo Bush and will be happy with someone with a brain living in the white house.
2007-12-23 14:22:39
·
answer #8
·
answered by sandyjean 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
What about Bhutto, Golda Meir and Endeira (sp?) Ghandi?
I cant imagine she will get much respect but I am not so sure it would be because she is a woman.
2007-12-23 14:05:59
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
You need to investigate more before you vote Obama. His past suggests that he does not like or respect white people and he was anti-American at one point in his life. He is also a Muslim and may side with them in a time of conflict.
Muslim. Anti-American. Dislikes Anglo's. He might see things their way.
You may not like what I wrote, but it is true. Check for yourself
2007-12-23 14:12:50
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 6
·
0⤊
2⤋