She was a Republican in college. She does have some conservative traits but does like her social programs. That is why she switched parties. Her family was very Republican.
2007-12-23 04:58:09
·
answer #1
·
answered by BekindtoAnimals22 7
·
2⤊
4⤋
Hillary, who changes to suit the moment, is currently posing as a centrist, but making some conservative noises in hopes of fooling some conservatives into thinking that she may finally not be as much of a leftist as they once thought. Don't be fooled. The Panderer-in-Chief, if elected, will, on her very first day in office, instantly shift from centrist to far left socialist faster than you can say "tax increase". She may become involved in a war, just to build her legacy, but she will work toward enacting every social program that she's been fantasizing about all of her adult life. Anyone who can't see that Hillary is a chronic chameleon has no business going into a voting booth.
2007-12-23 05:58:25
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
No! I would clarify that a conservative would not follow the Black Panthers trial as Hillary did as a law student to try to find civil rights violations for a basis of appeal.
This was what Bill Clinton was talking about when he said, that in law school, Hillary worked on legal services for the poor.
If Hillary were a conservative she would not have interned under Bob Truehaft, the head of the California Communist party.
A conservative would not want to close GITMO and allow enemy combatant to move to the USA where they would have access to our legal system.
She wants to grant constitutional rights to enemy combatants captured on the battle field.
She wants to eliminate the monitoring of suspected Al Qaeda cells and supporters in the USA.
Hillary's agenda is socialistic in nature.
Doesn't sound like any conservative that I know.
"MERRY CHRISTMAS!"
.
2007-12-23 05:12:29
·
answer #3
·
answered by Moody Red 6
·
4⤊
1⤋
Some people think Hillary is a Socialist and therefore not even close to conservative. Others say she is Conservative posing as a liberal. Actually that probably means she is running right up the middle.
2007-12-23 05:17:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
4⤋
Hillary Clinton is no conservative, she is a socialist in the authoritarian vein
2007-12-23 04:57:19
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
0⤋
the only elitism I care approximately is the financial elitism of the Republican occasion: continually rigging the sport to prefer the wealthy and companies. conserving salary inner maximum whilst socializing probability. it rather isn't any longer purely unfair, it motives stuff like the crumple of Indy financial business enterprise, Lehman Bros, AIG, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, etc. etc. advert nauseam.
2016-10-09 02:45:38
·
answer #6
·
answered by mancinelli 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
To answer your question;
No, I would disagree. Hillary changes her stance to the views of the current group she is speaking too.
2007-12-23 04:58:56
·
answer #7
·
answered by T-Bone 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
Snort! This is a joke right? Hells believes in Universal Health-Care, a Republicans worst NIGHTMARE. No Republican will vote for her, unless Al Gore were to come up behind one, and bump their elbow, while they punched a chad!
2007-12-23 05:31:27
·
answer #8
·
answered by xenypoo 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
I think Hillary is a true moderate, who seeks solutions that are balanced between the public and private sector. I think that Hillary believes in making government work for people by working with businesses to promote our national interests.
Third way politics promotes effective government working to evenly enforce a fair set of rules to promote the general welfare, commerce, and trade in general. An effective market system requires competition, and competition requires an evenly enforced fair set of rules. like pro-sports.
The free market people do not want competition or a fair set of rules, they want to rob the people while hiding behind a military police state.
2007-12-23 05:04:48
·
answer #9
·
answered by poet1b 4
·
0⤊
5⤋
Yes, she is "conservative" on foreign policy. She supported the war on Iraq and voted "yes" on the war resolution against Iran. Two of her advisers are also middle east war hawks.
2007-12-23 04:59:03
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋