Yes or no and your reasons.
2007-12-23 04:22:44 · 7 answers · asked by The Mick 7 7 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
keyshawn is a great analyst and he knows what he is talking about. he has great camera presence and charisma. he was the best replacement for micheal irvin and they would be crazy to get rid of him. i think emmitt wont be back, he tends to stumble and fumble with what he is trying to say a lot. im a huge cowboys fan but i think emmitt should be the one to go. of the guys still playing micheal strahan would be a good analyst. you have to have guys who know how to play to the cameras and carry on a decent conversation while they are being interviewed and Keyshawn does it better than most anybody.
2007-12-23 04:46:25 · answer #1 · answered by originalitybygeorge 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Yes. For a first year guy he's done a pretty good job. He did a whole lot better than Jerry Glanville did back in the day. Keyshawn is young, energetic, and conducts a good interview.
I'd really like to see the three goofballs in the booth calling the games gone. The only thing I hear out of them is constant goofy laughter and no real symbiosis. They seem to be too happy to be there.
2007-12-23 22:19:03 · answer #2 · answered by Pappa Poopy 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He's obnoxious, annoying, and a know-it-all. So my guess is that yes, they will renew his contract, because they always seem to have one guy like that in the group.
It's almost embarrassing listening to intelligent analysts like Ron Jaworski or Tom Jackson, then listening to Keyshawn, a guy who I doubt has spent 10 minutes in film study since his retirement. He's like a more annoying version of Michael Irvin, who stuck around a long time. It's not surprising, though, given that Keyshawn was an obnoxious guy even during his playing days.
2007-12-23 12:36:56 · answer #3 · answered by Craig S 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Yes, I think they will. Since he retired from football this year, he brings a more recent perspective of the league to the panel. He is intelligent, well spoken and I think brings a lot of passion to the discussions on the show. His interview with Chad Johnson earlier in the season was one of the best all year.
He is very outspoken and I can see why that may rub people the wrong way, but I like him and hope they bring him back.
2007-12-23 12:54:22 · answer #4 · answered by The Big Hurt 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
They shouldn't. On ESPN only Mike and Mike plus Mike Dikta know what they are talking about. So other than those 3 they should get rid of everybody else.
2007-12-23 12:39:05 · answer #5 · answered by aabigaa2 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Hopefully not. He's a hypocritical drama queen. He is supposed to report the stories, not create them or be part of them.
2007-12-23 13:45:51 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
No - he's an obnoxious, pompous, failure-just like when he played
2007-12-23 12:27:58 · answer #7 · answered by boilerrat 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋