I'd be more likely to vote for him for governor than for president because the only thing I have heard him say so far that I have really disliked was concerning international affairs.
I am for a smaller government & that is what I like the most about Ron Paul.
I am considering voting for him in the primaries for no other reason than to send a message to the other Republicans that we want less government, not just less socialism.
2007-12-23 04:37:04
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
YES!
He is the only politician who seems to have read the Constitution and understands it.
the folk who think his ideas are way out are not at all familiar with the Constitution or Bill of Rights. I would challenge them to make a quick read and see whether Ron Paul knows about that which he speaks.
2007-12-23 12:36:02
·
answer #2
·
answered by fretochose 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
I wouldn't vote for Ron Paul if he were running for dog catcher.
2007-12-23 12:31:08
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Yes I would ! I have listened to him many times and believe that he understands economics and diplomacy very well. He's also a Veteran, which he doesn't flaunt like some other candidates do.
2007-12-23 12:51:47
·
answer #4
·
answered by Big Bear 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
To answer your question;
No, I would not vote for Ron Paul, period.
2007-12-23 12:26:05
·
answer #5
·
answered by T-Bone 7
·
3⤊
2⤋
Yes,I wish I could. I'm in NY and stuck with Spitzer.
2007-12-23 12:33:10
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, anyone would be better than the crook in Illinois right now.
2007-12-23 12:24:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by Heaven J Daddy 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
Yes, better than stupid Corzine who has done nothing.
2007-12-23 12:35:33
·
answer #8
·
answered by cynical 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not for all the tea in China.
2007-12-23 12:28:03
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
No because he'd try to ban gay marriage and ban abortion.
2007-12-23 12:26:21
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋