I don't live there and can't for a long long time but I read the paper on Yahoo and wonder from the headlines if it's true... wanna chat... think we'd have to unless you can answer this one in one go, anyways thanks for the time invested and read your feedback.
2007-12-22 17:03:11 · 8 answers · asked by The Coroner of China 3 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Medicine
It looks to me like they don't or just about as bad, like the spying on the US in the first place but I could be wrong hope this gets to ya.
Translated by Sombrero Siesta
Victoria Bc
2007-12-22 17:13:25 · update #1
If H.R.1955 goes through, then no.
2007-12-22 17:06:16 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
it's sad that us citizens would think they are under a bush. indeed most are and haven't a clue what goals bush has or if indeed he is just a poorly operated puppet of cheney. I am not sure if there are final goals of our politicians but know only my observations. Very huge quantities of money are made available to bush administration to "keep merica free". very large amounts of taxpayer money is unaccountable for. Bush' friends are getting richer, my friends aren't.
terrorists have benefit of the us legal system in ways no poor us citizen does.
They are given spectacular headlines for years and much press with high dollar lawyers names involved free. Some of it's due the the income generated from shock media of any kind. there is no swiftness of prosecution of their law infractions while low income cases are processed batch load to fill prisons to capacity and have to sub out containing "criminals" to private large corporations.
if there were prosecutors who conscientiously and swiftly prosecuted violations of the law unilaterally the whole wmd and associated lies to war in iraq would have stopped the bush regime years ago.
new laws are not an answer to anything, the laws exist to take care of current problems they are just not being enforced.
us prosecutors decide what they work and what they ignore, until there is a system in place to hold prosecutors responsible to prosecute all violations of law equally judging the rights of individuals is impossible.
the price of your lawyer decides the justice the court dispenses in the us now, we need no more proof of that.
so.... in that terrorists have access to more expensive lawyers, yes, in the real world they do have more rights than the average us citizen under current conditions.
2007-12-23 01:55:29 · answer #2 · answered by Michael 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
no matter who is the president, what direction he/she seems to be leading the country, no matter what the media in this country or others may write.....citizens of the United States have more rights, freedoms, and opportunites than the people of many other countries...there is no comparison to my individual rights and those of a terrorist...
2007-12-23 20:50:46 · answer #3 · answered by mago 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Lol...thank God he won't be in for another term or we'd have less than terrorists.
2007-12-23 01:07:25 · answer #4 · answered by MadforMAC 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes we do have more rights. This is a loaded question?
2007-12-23 01:07:32 · answer #5 · answered by Chaz 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
george bush jr is the terrorist
2007-12-23 01:07:56 · answer #6 · answered by muslima 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
asd
2007-12-23 01:05:33 · answer #7 · answered by <3 Boy trouble maniac 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
hts...lol
2007-12-23 01:07:20 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋