At least he has finally admitted what sensible people knew all along -- he was never guided by the wishes of the british public.
2007-12-22 09:44:48 · 6 answers · asked by P P 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
I think the question is pretty clear - it seems very clear that blair was never interested in what the people of the country wanted - so who or what was he representing?
2007-12-23 10:33:25 · update #1
well their is a pick of anti-christs, Ehud whathisface the Israel Prime Minister, Bush, Brown, Pope...geez in these paranoid times it could even be the postman!
2007-12-22 09:53:23 · answer #1 · answered by My Pitseleh 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The concept of anti-christ,is somebody coming aganist christianity.Anti Christ means that christanity may end.It may be by Muslim fundamentalists.I DONOT THINK BLAIR IS WITH THEM.
2007-12-24 01:24:54 · answer #2 · answered by leowin1948 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A question with no meaning. The main body has no relation whatsoever to the main topic. How do you expect the reader not to be baffled, if you the asker gets everything in a jumble?
What does your topic mean?
2007-12-22 18:48:05 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
And we've progressed from the days when we used to burn Catholics?
Not if this questioner is anything to go by.
2007-12-22 17:56:33 · answer #4 · answered by Mr Sceptic 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
what are you saying he was guided by rome?or the vatican?
2007-12-22 17:53:12 · answer #5 · answered by Andrew1968 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
what?
2007-12-23 20:29:00 · answer #6 · answered by number one fighting chicken 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋