Should Iran be allowed to have nuclear weapons?

Question

This is a rhetorical question!

They execute innocent children there

Iranians should not be allowed to play with matches or sharp objects.

Answer 1

Not at all. Iran should not be allowed to have nuclear weapons

Answer 2

Please do not post inflamatory comments. the situation is bad enough without that.

But to answer you honestly - No. There should not be more weapons like that allowed anywhere in the world. Iran is not an exception it should be the rule.

Who would use such a terrible thing. What would be the consequences. What would be the gains. the radiation and fallout alone would make any area uninhabitable. Some as N. Korea. Pakistan & India. Having such a weapon and using it are two entirely different things. It is like a gun with no bullets - Useless unless you load it. Once loaded if you point it, it is a useless gensture unless you fully commit to pulling the trigger. Then you must live with the inevitable results.

The present wars indicate that even the least and weakest of combatants can do great damage without much more than common weapons.

What can representatives of humanity be thinking of when suggesting the continued existance, much less use, of such terrible things.

Darth, what one society does as a result of religion, culture or tradition has little bearing onn the right, or not, to posess such weapons. Iranians are not the only society that has or does unspeakable thing to members of their society i the name of custom or religion. Your comment can apply to many peoples and many societies. It is not exclusive to Iran or Iraq.

By the way, Iranians were playing with matches AND sharp objects before many tribes in England and Europe were wearing clothes and living in organized societies.

Answer 3

I am not sure how to take that question.

While we fight in the middle east for freedom, people are asking what Iran should be allowed to do.

So what your saying is... they should only be allowed what freedom we let them have.
I don't think the USA is in any position to be the world police when we illegally invade other countries.

Also we have children that die every day because of no heath insurance.
If you are supposed to be the biggest most powerful and rich country in the world, you would think that letting innocent children die because they do not have heath insurance would be a crime.
Here in the USA it happens on a daily basis.

We need to take care of home first!!!!

Answer 4

Are they even developing nuclear weapons? Before you talk about if they should be allowed, maybe you should prove that first.

Answer 5

no, but they should get nuclear power as allowed under the nuclear non proliferation treaty.

i would like to know how you worked out that they slaughter innocent children there?

Answer 6

Yes, the USA doesn't attack countries with nuclear weapons, so I would support all countries having them.

Answer 7

Actually i think they are much more peaceful than our current war criminal Gov ?

Also is none of US business what Iran does ??

Damn when are you guys going to stop being so coincided and pushy ? You are just another human like the other 6 B ?

Bunch of Gi Joe kids ?! lol

What the hell do you know about Iran and politics abroad?
You don't know - - i - from shinola.

The 4 postings below : outstanding Ideas thanks for sharing.
That's what Pres Man of Iran Suggested about 2 years ago, no Nuclear weapons in the world.

Answer 8

Iran is a real problem. But we will deal with it. Pray first. Then pass the ammunition.
I Cr 13;8a

Answer 9

No, they signed the NPT, they should abide by it.

They can be controlled through non military means by an intelligent, less ideologically driven administration.

Don't drink the Kool Aid, we can't handle another war.

Answer 10

No one should!