Hillary can definitely get the job done right--she's not just talk like the Republican candidates who look and sound like they're ready for a rest home, not the White House:
"We have relied on a myth of homeland security, a myth written in rhetoric, inadequate resources, and a new bureaucracy, instead of relying on good old fashioned American ingenuity, might and muscle."
Senator Hillary Clinton, 1-24-2003
2007-12-22 13:55:50
·
answer #1
·
answered by edith clarke 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
the funniest retort from the average con is that she is "manly", or she is a "lesbian". But you are absolutely correct, as the republican party has regressed to nothing more than a half-baked religion, the candidate pool of strong leadership has dwindled alongside intelligent reasoning. If the worst they can say is hillary is a man, there is nothing to worry about.
2007-12-21 18:05:46
·
answer #2
·
answered by bonx 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
If Hillary runs and is in solid sufficient actual and psychological well being to be president she would be ready to be unbeatable. by 2016 she would be ready to be too previous to run for president. I doubt that she might prefer to probability having yet another dementia affected person as president. remember Ronald Reagan who became president at 70?
2016-10-09 01:53:17
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because she is corrupt, and a liar. She has you fooled. And this is coming from a Democrat. She failed in healthcare, has taken the most lobbyist money (Other then Guliani of course) and ais out for personal gain, and not to make America, and the world a better place to live in.
2007-12-21 18:07:45
·
answer #4
·
answered by Darin D 2
·
0⤊
3⤋
that's ridiculous. she has proven herself a liar again and again, and willing to resort to underhanded Republican tactics to gain ground in the primaries.
the only "non-wuss" in the entire RACE has nothing to do with "manly" issues -- he is strong enough not to take corporate money for his campaign.
vote Kucinich!
2007-12-21 20:06:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by Andrew 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
Are you kidding? Check out www.ronpaul2008.com He's a real candidate who totally understands and supports the Constitution of the United States. He understands that it is the federal government's business to provide and protect freedom for it's citizens to pursue happiness in whatever way they would like. It is NOT the government's job to take care of it's citizens. He is no "wuss". And he's not a sell-out. That's why he was able to raise over $15 millin in one day on the internet alone.
2007-12-21 17:59:31
·
answer #6
·
answered by Ariel 2
·
2⤊
6⤋
hillary clinton is the toughest man currently in politcs
2007-12-21 17:56:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by Bulldog 5
·
5⤊
2⤋
Puh-lease... They asked her a question and she almost teared up and said after the debate... "It's the old boys trying to tear me down because I'm a female..."
I wouldn't vote for her for dog catcher. She needs to go home and make some cookies.
2007-12-21 18:00:56
·
answer #8
·
answered by James B 5
·
4⤊
4⤋
Maybe, but she is not focusing on the problem she is just focusing on making herself get there for her own satisfaction just like Bush. But believe me any other candidate is much better than our current leader.
2007-12-21 17:59:47
·
answer #9
·
answered by wonpetty 2
·
4⤊
4⤋
huh?
I think Hillary has become very arrogent and way too self assured, I find it abrasive.
I think she is better than that. And gosh that awful tv add with the packages. She should be more profisional.
She needs to be elected because of her politics and not because that she is a woman
2007-12-21 17:58:39
·
answer #10
·
answered by clcalifornia 7
·
2⤊
6⤋