I don't think thats bad; there's always been the issue of whether we're going to have enough food to feed everyone. Population across the world is growing, but our food production had not kept pace.
2007-12-21 17:38:09
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Some larger, economically-developed countries are populated with individuals who are consciously having fewer babies. It may be an over-simplification, but education and wealth tends to decrease the need for large families.
This reference to birth control chemicals in the water seems very far-fetched. In order to have an effect, the dosage has to be significant. I doubt the dosage, if any, is sufficient to have a significant effect on those women who drink water. And let's don't forget how much water we use to wash, flush, and keep the garden green.
Local water supply is controlled locally, so I have one more layer of skepticism in this birth-control-in-the-water notion. Sorry, it just doesn't wash with me.
Where fertility seems to be at traditionally high levels is in underdeveloped countries. Look for cause-and-effect in the economic realm, not the water supply.
2007-12-21 17:41:13
·
answer #2
·
answered by going_for_baroque 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
My theory has always been that the people that wouldn't be chosen for mating..physical appearance or not healthy breeding stock, are the ones that get the most physical enhancements (plastic surgery) or medical attention, fertility pills or invetrio fertilization. Also the false attractiveness that Madison ave sells to the public. This less than stellar DNA is becoming the norm thus snowballing.
2007-12-21 22:33:12
·
answer #3
·
answered by Michael B 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
There are companies that do help with the expenses of fertility therapy whether it fairly is a disgrace there aren’t extra. whilst we at the instant are not nicely off we are hard our recommendations to have a organic baby. We did no longer think of shall we've the money for it yet once you're infertile, your desire to adventure being pregnant and have a organic baby isn't faded and you hit upon techniques. I certainly have long previous by means of 4 failed IVF cycles. we've to date spent under what i might if I have been to undertake. and people who think of you may “purely undertake” are very ignorant on the priority. coverage companies DO pay for people who be bothered by disabilities. My coverage business employer has no longer helped us one penny. nevertheless we are becoming by ability of to date, our nicely is working dry. we can not have the money for to maintain going plenty longer. it fairly is unlucky, i'm in an extremely solid and loving courting, my husband is my ultimate chum and we've been married for 14 years. We come from stunning households. we are the two instructors and have a vast information, hobby, and love for toddlers. A “Commodity”? Is a paraplegic‘s desire to stroll, a blind guy’s craving to work out, or a deaf guy or woman’s longing to pay attention selfish? you have a baby. you incredibly have no thought what it fairly is prefer to be bothered by time-honored infertility. you haven't any longer any thought what it fairly is prefer to pass a pregnant lady on the line, pay attention slightly one cry in church, or get bombarded with Christmas enjoying cards each year with people’s toddlers on them once you do not have a baby. i'm regrettably approximately to miscarry. We observed a heartbeat 2 weeks in the past and purely final week our infant stopped becoming. it fairly is fairly uncommon. We have been exceptionally much there. i'm conserving directly to the reality that I do have an astounding hazard for fulfillment and we are able to attempt back. This baby we want, this baby we are attempting to create isn't a trifling commodity for us. God forbid something could desire to take place on your baby, what lengths might you pass?
2016-11-24 19:17:44
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's because of
a) The existence of contraceptives.
b) Careers for women. The former social stigma against delaying marriage is no longer quite so strong as it once was.
c) Sexual selection, unrealistic expectations through mass media. Now that I've seen Heidi Klum in a Santa suit on TV, I'm not going to marry anyone who doesn't look as good as she does.
2007-12-22 09:39:20
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Human males are becoming less fertile. This is because of some DNA that is passed down from father to son and is not mixed with the mother's DNA. When some mutation causes a problem in the male's DNA that makes him infetile it's the end of the line.
This may be what happens to most species as they age.
2007-12-22 01:28:46
·
answer #6
·
answered by Joan H 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Stress could be a major reason reason for infertility. And you have to agree that there are actually very few people who are not stressed out. But most of them might be find some outlet for the stress. The ones who don't, might, over a prolonged period of time, become infertile.
2007-12-21 17:40:04
·
answer #7
·
answered by christine selvan 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
it has to do with the economy, the cost of living, the responsibility of having to hold a job as a woman and also my own theory is its gods way of thinning out the fools of the world
2007-12-21 17:37:43
·
answer #8
·
answered by bob67cam 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think its all the **** they are putting in our food...the crap they are feeding our animals, and then passing along in the processed food. Its gross. Even "organic" food isn't as organic as you think it is. This is just a theory I have, I cant think of another reason at the moment. But a good theory, wouldnt ya say?
2007-12-21 17:32:44
·
answer #9
·
answered by Honeychild 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is not that fertility is decreasing, contraceptives are increasing. Women just don't want to have as many babies as this and also economic conditions improve.
2007-12-21 17:34:43
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋