Shhhhh. If Hillary gets the Democratic Nomination, it pretty much guarantees the Republican nominee to get the Presidency. Be quiet so they don't catch on.
2007-12-21 17:07:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by Put on your boxing gloves boys! 4
·
2⤊
5⤋
Many people may think Howard Dean is smart and clever, but as it turns out...he is quite possibly the most stupid person to ever head the DNC. And if it's not due to sheer stupidity, a solid case for insanity can be made as to how inept his handling of electoral strategy and candidate positioning is.
The bottom line is, America (and even a large portion of the press) are sick of the Clinton trailer trash parade. I mean, really, do we need more of their crap on display than we've already had? I cringe at the thought of those scoundrels representing this country for a 3rd and 4th term.
2007-12-21 17:37:30
·
answer #2
·
answered by Salsa Shark 4
·
2⤊
2⤋
Howard Dean is now just a barking dog. Both political party is a school for pet dogs.
The DNC just seems to be the dogs with the " F "
2007-12-21 18:41:02
·
answer #3
·
answered by The One 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Howard Dean is not stupid. He is the reason the democrats took the House and the Senate in 2006.
I remember the Republicans getting a good smack down (thrashing, thumping, beating, pounding and general beat down) in 2006.
So, no the democrats are not the stupid ones.
Also, why would you even use the word token?
Obama and Clinton are both 100% better than the likes of Bush and just as competent or better than any of the Republican candidates.
2007-12-21 17:22:18
·
answer #4
·
answered by Angel 4
·
3⤊
2⤋
Not all of America thinks Hillary is a bad choice. Her ratings are more in favor of her than against her. As far as Secondary Candidates, why would you consider them token offerings? If you're referring to Obama and Edwards, they are more likely to get elected than a Republican. If you're talking about the second tier, it's the same for both parties...they don't have a chance.
2007-12-21 17:30:38
·
answer #5
·
answered by Lisa M 5
·
1⤊
3⤋
I'm not especially worried about what they're doing or, what they're thinking at this point. I'm just glad they're maintaining the status quo - screwing up during the presidential election season.
2007-12-21 20:08:39
·
answer #6
·
answered by wider scope 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Republicans don't have a candidate who could beat any of the Democratic candidates. Do you think Southern Baptists, Fundamentalists or Evangelicals would vote for Giuliani? Do you think most people, of any religion other than Mormon, would vote for Romney? Republicans are not famous for their tolerance and they show that with Huckabee. That's the way I see it!
2007-12-21 17:34:14
·
answer #7
·
answered by ArRo 6
·
2⤊
3⤋
Nope, at least the DNC does not have to accept responsibility for Rudy.
2007-12-21 17:12:05
·
answer #8
·
answered by Think 1st 7
·
3⤊
4⤋