English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

quantum physics states that reality prior to obsvervation exist only as a non-local timeless probability of states(Copenhagen interpretation, bells theorem, schrodingers wave equation, and the apsect experiments)
Today all of this reveals the importance of consciousness and how it relates to "physical reality" Which exists as only a probable non-local timeless state prior to observation, further to say that "physical reality" can or does exist prior to human observation necessitates a primary or original consciousness to make the observation/state collapse. Deeper still, the consciousness must be said to have a non-quantum/physical quality or you will reach infinite descent which is not possible in a quanta/physical reality as quanta are finite therefore at the end of the chain of physical obsevation there must exist a nonquantum quality to the nature of concsiousness for the obseveration of physical reality. So it is logical to either dismiss all assumptions about empirical knowledge and the ablitity to know our nuniverse or we must accept the non-quantum and primary consciousness aspects that are required of physical reality both prior to and existent after the evolution of other forms of consciousenss and also that physical reality is dependent upon and to some extent determined by the primary/original and our own individal/self consciousness.
Therefore we should move into an area in which science takes the same objective aproach to conciousness as was done with physical reality if humans are ever to develop a thereoy of everthing?
Please critique this logic

2007-12-21 15:57:47 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics Physics

to frank see delayed choice two slit experiment.

2007-12-21 19:16:36 · update #1

5 answers

You haven't established a relationship between consciousness and physical reality (quantum or classical). It is therefore not meaningful to draw conclusions based on that relationship.

2007-12-21 17:44:17 · answer #1 · answered by Frank N 7 · 0 0

Yes they do say that looking at something can change it's quanta properties, unless the system is paired. The Human brain is a very powerful thing, however it works on many levels. The first level is that of potentials. This the network (nero net) which is fashioned by the experiences present to it by the sensors. As experiences build up network pathways are formed. The second level is that of digital ability. The cells of the brain, and every cell have, mircotubes. These mircotubes are proteins arranged in a "C" shape. Either open for off and closed for on, and very much the same way a computer microchip functions. Each neuron has up in the order of 80 strands while skin cells may have about five. A neuron, they say, is far more powerful than any computer. However the pure digital processing capacity is held behind the potentialisation action that occurs at the synapse. Einstein was working on the theory of everything before he died. I believe that he was looking into the nature of the universe and trying someway of explaining it. I like the way You can use words, it shows You have understanding about the hardest questions in the World.
Regards Al

2007-12-22 00:29:07 · answer #2 · answered by Al 3 · 0 0

consciousness - the science of psychology.
physics does play a role in the object consciousness, this by the quantum, particle, elemental and compounds of the brain.
though this logical idea could be studied for hours, "I'd say it's like knowing you were going to wake up the moment you did, and there you are."
seems like a good logical thought.

2007-12-22 00:37:38 · answer #3 · answered by stevenos_2005 2 · 0 0

If a tree fell in a forest but no one was there to hear it, would it make a sound?

Yep - we're more than physical, we're spiritual - what's the stuff THAT's made of? Must be out there...

Right on!

2007-12-22 00:06:59 · answer #4 · answered by Right Guard 6 · 0 0

I believe your logic to be pretty sound

2007-12-22 00:06:48 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers