Is it because it was all the truth and you could not stand having to read the truth and let it be said, remembered, and brought out in the open for the whole wide world to see....the facts were all there, in black and white. Just reading that letter made me realize why I don't ever want to vote for a Clinton again. It's all about integrity, honor, and justice.
2007-12-21 15:26:58 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Yes, well, it was not a question, and I can see why you reported it.
However, it was asked again in a more appropriate question. So, it's still being asked, if there is anyone who didn't get the chance to read it.
2007-12-21 16:05:17 · update #1
I wish I could have seen it...can you email it?
Oh, so I don't get reported, to answer your question, nothing was wrong, people in here have power they wish they had in the real world...if you type something they disagree with, they press report, and it disappears.
2007-12-21 15:31:06 · answer #1 · answered by Yahoo Answer Angel 6 · 4⤊ 3⤋
I didn't get to read it-the question was deleted before I got to it. And Bill Clinton is retired from the Presidency and has no plans to "run" for any offices-last I heard. So you are not likely to ever get a chance to "not" vote for him.
I found the re-post of it and this is what I said:
Yes I have seen that letter before-about 4 years ago-just after Bush was declared the Presidential winner over Al Gore. I also received an email concerning what George W. Bush's Resume would say if it contained the raw truth. When I posted it here I was honest enough to say I received it in an email. I do not know who the author of it was and that too I have acknowledged.
In addition to that I could say that anyone can "spin" a story or distort facts to accomplish the reaction they hope for when the reader has only that persons opinion and information to go by. When a person uses their critical thinking skills-does a little research-sincerely seeks the facts then they can tell what common fallacies and flawed logic was used to produce the material in question.
2007-12-21 23:45:26 · answer #2 · answered by PrivacyNowPlease! 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Agree with the majority here. There is a small group of whiners who absolutely HATE Bill CLinton. Frankly, I didn't think he was that great a President, and resent his selling us out by pushing NAFTA through thereby exporting our manufacturing base and the jobs that used to pay good money. But I wouldn't make up all those lies and rumors and spread them around as if they were truth.
Yahoo changed it's format to eliminate the sludge. That was sludge.
2007-12-21 23:39:26 · answer #3 · answered by Larry A 5 · 2⤊ 3⤋
That doesn't appear to be a question. Maybe you should find a more appropriate venue to give a dissertation in.
2007-12-21 23:34:23 · answer #4 · answered by Michael 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
It was a rant that was full of lies. Clinton was never found guilty of sexual harassment. Whitewater was a land deal that the Clintons lost money on. There were no convictions of anyone in the administration. On and on....
2007-12-21 23:33:42 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 4⤋
It was political rant without actually asking a question!
2007-12-21 23:36:57 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
It was a rant. Not a question. And it was a smattering of truth and a big helping of outright lies. For example, the rumor that the clinton staff destroyed white house property on the way out (like removing all the "w"s from the keyboards), has been thoroughly debunked.
2007-12-21 23:30:51 · answer #7 · answered by mikegreenwich 4 · 6⤊ 8⤋
no it was because it shows you don't read the news, that is the bush who is the must incapable president of the united state
2007-12-21 23:32:29 · answer #8 · answered by santa s 4 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Liberals like to report people they don't agree with. If they could somehow ruin you for life, I think they would.
2007-12-21 23:35:04 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 5⤋
Who reported it? Hillary?
2007-12-21 23:31:48 · answer #10 · answered by tootsie 5 · 2⤊ 5⤋