No, Bush has lied big time and I will vote for Obama next election because he is a Democrat and will end the Iraq mess as soon as possible. G.W. Bush sucks big time!!!!
2007-12-21 07:25:40
·
answer #1
·
answered by Zack H 3
·
4⤊
2⤋
Don't suppose that all Americans supported the illegal invasion of Iraq. The problem is, those that didn't support him had their voices drowned out by the ultra-conservative right wing in this country. After 9/11/01, anyone who didn't fall in lock-step with his ideas was labelled "unpatriotic" and "anti-American".
To answer your question, Bush is an ignorant fascist who should be impeached and tried for war crimes before a UN tribunal. There have been so many breaches of the US Constitution by this administration it's ridiculous. I fear what future generations will say about us...probably what we say about the Germans in the lead-up to WW2. "What were you thinking? Why didn't you do anything? How could you have let this happen?"
We tried...we really tried...but like Bush is fond of saying, "9/11 changed everything". Yeah, 9/11 changed everything all right. That's when this country became a dictatorship and the Constitutional rights enjoyed by all Americans for the past 200+ years were surreptitiously flushed down the toilet.
2007-12-21 08:43:26
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Wow I am totally against Bush! I never liked him from the start. He is awful at speaking, making decisions, and he made many countries hate us! He also totally doesn't care about the environment. I think people should have researched him alot more before voting him into office because it really hurt our country and we need a Democrat to put us back on track.
I think Hillary Clinton should be voted in because she has so much experience especially with her husband being in office. She's been a senator for many years and I don't think people should judge her right away after not even knowing anything about her. People need to do a lot more research and be more open minded about serious issues like presidency. Hillary is so clever when she speaks and we are ready for a woman president!
2007-12-21 07:28:00
·
answer #3
·
answered by AMA 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
I am loyal to whoever this country selects as its leader...I disagree with George W Bush polices but I support the principles of the War on Terror.
In the next election I will vote for Obama if nominated..If not I will definately vote republican..Probably Huckabee.
2007-12-21 08:00:23
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
he is a good money maker for himself and his buddies. between him and chaney, theyve made billions for blackwater and halliburton. theyve done nothing for this country except ignore the citizens wishes. a while back, bush warned about social security funds after spending all of the reserves on an oil war. what do you expect from an oilman with social and financial ties to the bin ladens. to me, he is a criminal. hes broken more laws than any president before him. as far as voting, no matter whos elected, hes screwed things up so bad, that the next president will not be able to repair the damage in one term, and will look foolish. im voting for jesus christ, he the only one who can get us out of this mess.
2007-12-21 07:51:02
·
answer #5
·
answered by chris l 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
No, I don't support the disaster made by him in Iraq but he is still our president and eventhough there were no weapons of massive destruction, he is still in office.
I wouldn't vote for Bush even if he isn't running anymore. We should have learned our lesson by now. I am so dissapointed at how he keeps vetoed the children's health. It shows he doesn't have compassion for children. I am disappointed with him.
2007-12-21 07:28:57
·
answer #6
·
answered by Davey Boy Smith #1 Fan- VACATION 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
Can't believe what I am reading here. We're losing the war? The way G.W. has been fighting terrorism to protect your sorry butts has been all wrong?
Get a grip children, those friggen' maniacs want to kill you, make no mistake about it.
What ever all the reasons you may think we went to Iraq, doesn't matter because it is being done with a Volunteer MILITARY. In other words something none of you little children apparently know anything about.
I for one am thankful for G.W. & Staff keeping the watch over my family knowing there is no one better qualified to do it.
2007-12-21 07:55:28
·
answer #7
·
answered by labdoctor 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
As an American citizen, I am loyal to almost whomever is in charge. I am loyal to Bush. I do not support Bush. The difference between loyal and support is that I am loyal to Bush because I am loyal to the United States of America. I do not support Bush because he has made a fool of himself in nearly every venture he does.
I will vote Republican in the upcoming election because the Democratic candidate will either be Clinton or Obama and I support neither. I
2007-12-21 07:27:15
·
answer #8
·
answered by ARAX 2
·
1⤊
3⤋
Figures a liberal devoid of regard for his very own life. i assume your answer on your guy or woman question might desire to be for the U. S. to take a seat around and await 9/11/01 cases one hundred and for all human beings to die. you're a fool to think of of that we are threat-unfastened and that we are able to on no account be attacked decrease back. it extremely isn't suited who's extremely than paintings, we are besides the reality that hated and can desire to be centred for as long via making use of actuality the international retains on turning.
2016-12-18 06:30:31
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm not a Bush supporter (I'm an independent and try to be objective), but while I certainly don't agree with his decisions, not knowing if their were WMD in Iraq or not was not his fought. First, Intelligence DID say they believed their were (the same intelligence given to Clinton). Also, it is absolute FACT that there was, at least at one time, WMD in Iraq 9he used them AND they WERE identified by Military Recon units... I was in one of those units, and yes, i was one of the individuals supplying the intelligence). Also, understand, it was in Iraq's best interest for everyone to believe they had them, so first, by not allowing direct inspections, we had no way of knowing if they had disposed of them... and frankly, that was their intention. They wanted everyone to believe they had them, even if they didn't. It gave them a regional power and international bargaining tool. It just made good political sense... and let's be honest, before Bush, no one believe America has the will to go to war in this way... precisely because of the political strife we now find our self's in. finally, while it is very polical to say Iraq didn't have WMD's, there is evidence to believe they did (now hidden, also removed to Syria as we were initially invading). Remember, big Desert, little bombs. They hid entire fleats of Jets and it took years to find (a plane tail was stumbled over by military troops in the desert), you honestly believe they couldn't hind a few bombs. and again, even if they didn't, it was reseasable to believe they did. As for Bush, generally poor leader, I don't like his Ideaology, but he is a U.S. citizen, and like it or not, he was voted in... and while democracy is a "mob rules" system, it is stillthe best available system we can have. democracy means the majority wins, not the right or best wins, just the majority. If you participate in democracy, you must be just as willing to lose as you are to win. So let's vote him (well, anyone like him) out of office, otherwise, we get what we (as a Democracy) deserve.
As for who I will vote for... might be a democrate, might be a replucian, might be anindepentant or someone else. But I will vote for their merrits and leadership, not to be "right" or just to win at all cost, or because their at the most likely to cheat democracy by making the one who rightly would have had the majority lose. I will try my best to understand each issue, each individual and each sie of easch issue. Then I will descide. Good luck my fellow American, and thank you for your question.
2007-12-21 07:44:28
·
answer #10
·
answered by tom s 3
·
0⤊
0⤋