Yes, there are more rats, more sheep, more flies, more mosquito's, more krill, and the lists goes on. There are many plant and animal species that are more abundant than humans; our abundance is much more damaging to the environment so it's much more noticeable on a global scale.
2007-12-21 08:32:58
·
answer #1
·
answered by straightshooter 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
If any mammal has a shot at this, it would probably be the rat. Even then, I am not sure.
As for insects, oh yes. Big time. Ants outnumber us by a very large number alone.
Other vertebrates? Maybe certain kinds of fish but I am not sure on that. The ocean is a very large place and there are some fish that are in very large numbers in there.
2007-12-21 15:04:39
·
answer #2
·
answered by A.Mercer 7
·
4⤊
0⤋
Rats maybe?
There are way more insects than anything. Not sure though if any single species of insect would boast a population of more than 6 billion. Good question.
2007-12-21 15:05:40
·
answer #3
·
answered by Judge and Jury 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
The brown rat probably has a higher population. Several insect species are more abundant, particularly colony species such as ants and termites.
2007-12-21 15:04:45
·
answer #4
·
answered by Weise Ente 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Any mammals?? I doubt it.
But definitely insects. They are the most abundant animals on the planet (excluding single-celled and other microscopic organisms).
2007-12-21 15:02:40
·
answer #5
·
answered by Jared Z 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Many insects are. In fact, when locusts attack, as they did in the South Australlian wheat belt, a single swarm of locusts can number up to 100 billion.
Humans are only 0.5% of the heterotroph biomass on the earth.
2007-12-21 15:21:04
·
answer #6
·
answered by ch_ris_l 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
I would bet there are more mice or rats.
2007-12-21 15:08:03
·
answer #7
·
answered by Don 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
i guess ants
2007-12-21 15:25:14
·
answer #8
·
answered by kool dude 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
i would say it has to be birds.
2007-12-21 15:08:42
·
answer #9
·
answered by gray bird 3
·
0⤊
2⤋