I'm asking because if a non Yahoo employee would've asked the question I'm linking to, they would've received a violation for it:
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=ArbgqlE3XUoV45hwxjyTeuzsy6IX;_ylv=3?qid=20071219090657AANj195&show=7#profile-info-AA10030221
That question according to Yahoo's own policy would be considered chit chat.
2007-12-21 06:39:28 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
There's wide-spread debate over this very issue. Just goes to show that they have no respect for the very rules that they create for others!
And look at all the brown-nosers answering it!
2007-12-21 06:42:56 · answer #1 · answered by lonely1 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
That is what I was thinking when I saw the question.
But we know that there account probably has a zero violation flag. Maybe we should report the question and see what happens. Then again maybe not, I could see our accounts getting SHUT DOWN.
Boy this is staring to feel like work, manager comes in late everyday I come in late once and I get written up.
2007-12-21 14:44:53 · answer #2 · answered by ♥PirplePashn♥ 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I fully agree with you .
It should be the same rules for everyone.
But it's not
I had a level 7 account suspended/deleted for telling the Y!Amsters they weren't sticking to the rules they had posted in the Violations Forum.
I get suspended, and the week after they change the posted rules to what I had been asking them to put there for weeks.
Hypocrisy comes to mind.
2007-12-21 22:42:52 · answer #3 · answered by Weatherman 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Interesting. I have seen several Yahoo! Inc. employee questions that DO borderline chatting. Hmmmmm.
2007-12-29 13:28:59 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes
2007-12-21 14:42:20 · answer #5 · answered by Luck dragon 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
it is unfair
very hypocritical
2007-12-21 20:21:34 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
well doesn't the existence of that rabbi fraud prove that too
2007-12-21 14:42:39 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋