Exxon-Mobil paid him off by being his biggest sponsor in the 2004 election and by being his 2nd biggest donor in the 2000 election, only behind ENRON, a company of crooks.
2007-12-21 06:30:45
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Safety is more important than oil prices. And there is no oil shortage.
Even China is building up a large oil reserve for an emergency.
2007-12-21 06:32:22
·
answer #2
·
answered by a bush family member 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
Because we're saving those for a true emergency (like if we go to war and lose all of our incoming oil shipments), and because we don't really have enough refined oil to make a difference.
2007-12-21 06:30:48
·
answer #3
·
answered by tyler_shay4 2
·
1⤊
2⤋
Why hasn't the Palosi Congress rolled back the taxes on fuel, oh forgot she did promise to cut gas prices......but instead named a few post offices......
2007-12-21 06:39:38
·
answer #4
·
answered by garyb1616 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
That's for emergencies. I think he did put a little into the system once, not sure, but that is for a national emergency.
2007-12-21 06:32:54
·
answer #5
·
answered by The Scorpion 6
·
0⤊
2⤋
Who knows. Why was gas only $1.46 when he first took office? He has spreading freedom and democracy on his mind, not on us.
2007-12-21 06:30:52
·
answer #6
·
answered by MadLibs 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
Why would he? there is no oil shortage.
2007-12-21 06:32:20
·
answer #7
·
answered by Locutus1of1 5
·
2⤊
2⤋
because that is all we have and we need it for a emergency not for us to have cheaper gas.
2007-12-21 06:30:24
·
answer #8
·
answered by jilardi2 2
·
0⤊
3⤋
that's not really what Clinton did.
2007-12-21 06:36:39
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋