I'm 90,000 miles from a virtual planet at some distant point in space. From v=0, I begin accelerating to that point along a straight line. Passing through this point, I record my time and speed.
I do this again, but from 110,000 miles. I record my time and speed after traveling (accelerating) exactly 100,000 miles (10,000 miles short of this point).
While it is obvious t1 is 'less than' t2, I need to Prove V1(first trip)=v2 (second trip). 'average acceleration' will not work.
Yes, I tried astronomy/space
2007-12-21
05:52:45
·
2 answers
·
asked by
toolmaker
1
in
Science & Mathematics
➔ Physics
hi doc, the acceleration is less for the second trip, because of the increased distance from the target point, but the incresed distance will compensate for this.
2007-12-21
06:06:33 ·
update #1
'inverse square law'
2007-12-21
06:08:36 ·
update #2
Rick b. I like your approach to the problem, I was thinking the same thing a few moments ago. You missed the 'virtual' aspect however. We need a virtual point because we continue accelerating to that point. There is no surface, there is no 'real' planet. This is also nessesary because the 'inverse square law' applies to 'centers' of mass.
2007-12-21
08:06:54 ·
update #3