before he leaves office in 2008?
2007-12-21 00:02:51 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
You do hate America, don't you?
Iran is a terrorist state that has proclaimed that it wishes to destroy Israel. Nuclear weapons would give them the opportunity to do so, heaven forfend.
If Israel does indeed have a nuclear capability, it will use it only as a last resort, after a first strike by some other power.
Iran is the biggest threat to the West today, and their military capability must be curbed by the West.
In addition, individual terrorists must be eliminated--if necessary by engaging them and killing them.
There can be no rational argument against this two-pronged approach.
.
2007-12-22 05:38:31 · answer #1 · answered by Ivri_Anokhi 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The sky is not falling.
If the US President in office is George W. Bush the chances of our troops going to war against Iran will more than likely be addressed by him asking Congress for permission (again.)
Any other future President has the option of sending troops to war whether or not a sitting President gains approval from Congress... But the current President is a super classy guy and doesn't make snap decisions without first questioning military advisers and Congress.
2007-12-21 00:21:54 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
None of that is going to happen. Israel has already put Iran on notice that should they attempt to launch any kind of attack Iran will cease to exist. Israel knows that the Iran nuke weapon program is at a halt, but by saying that they don't believe it is, Israel is sending them a message...don't go there in the future. For now everything is back at it's usual equilibrium.....FUBAR!
2007-12-21 04:49:16 · answer #3 · answered by Noah H 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
different than for the unfavorable international problems it would desire to reason, even yet another international conflict (evaluate US and Russia entered in this way of recreation), and enable's assume it quite is merely Iran and Israel, the militia decision for Israel is out of query through quite a few motives that politicians and militarists extra advantageous know, in spite of what's propagated to excite and brainwash little ones like most of the above. if Israel would desire to do something severe to Iran, devoid of US intrude, middle east had a diverse face. we are speaking a pair of conflict between a militia and a rustic. you may desire to kill all of them to win a conflict with a rustic. deceased Saddam would desire to furnish some good advices to Israel on his reports in conflict with Iran. he first declared we can be in Tehran in each and every week; it took years for him to comprehend he became into so incorrect.
2016-10-09 01:04:03 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I doubt it but Bush has done weird things before. That would be a huge mistake.
Peace&Love
2007-12-21 01:42:05 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No but the forward thinking Bush admin may, hopefully.
2007-12-21 00:12:49 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
of course he will side with irseal, he always does, but he wont attack iran. u.s. will have very few allies when it comes to them, 16 other countries, including russia and china, know that the intell bush is putting out is false. and they know because they have their own intell that contridicts the presidents claims, and it seems to be more reliable than than anything bush claims to have.
2007-12-21 00:25:47 · answer #7 · answered by smarternow 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I do believe so....Hold on I must find a link
Here it is..... but the Relevant info is in the last 15 mins....It's a great Documentary...not US. so maby more accurate..If you like this Q you'll like this Too..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k1oPEfa9Lws
2007-12-21 02:44:23 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO, but I think the great Bush admin might.
2007-12-21 00:12:42 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I wouldn't doubt it. Bush supports the Israeli people more than he does Americans.
2007-12-21 00:12:15 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋