Would atheist have empathy or remorse if Jesus Crist really died for us?

Question

*I'm not trying to convert anyone, I am simply posing a question that I have been wondering about.*
Most of us have heard of all the terrible things that Jesus went through to save mankind (beaten, cruxified, etc...). With that in mind, I was wondering if any people that don not believe in Christ or God would feel bad if there was undeniable evendence that Jesus died on their behalf in order for them to have the chance not to go to hell.
Personally I think that there would be some that still would not feel any remorse, but I could be wrong.
Once again, I am not trying to convert anyone, or force any beliefs on anyone. I am just wondering about this.

Answer 1

Well, this evidence would only prove he died, not that he was God. If they thought he wasn't God, I think that they would be simply disturbed that someone would be mentally ill enough to think that they could die to save people born hundreds of years later. If he was God, and he proved it out of love, well, how do you think atheists feel when they are in the middle of converting? This realization is usually there.

Answer 2

No, I still find the whole notion to be ridiculous and inapplicable to me.

What Christians forget is that this concept of somebody suffering for the benefit of man is found in countless other religion mythologies. It's an archetype. Why should I have remorse for Jesus but not other sacrificed-and-resurrected figures like Prometheus or Osiris? For that matter, what about martyrs of other religions?

Your whole premise also rests on the notion that not only Jesus would be the solution, but that he's a solution to a problem that exists in the first place. People and characters have been described as suffering and/or dying for all sorts of things. At least the need for fire, which was the gift in the story of Prometheus, is more believable.

By the way, I know some Christians who don't like how other Christians push Jesus as a "Get out of jail free" card.

Answer 3

Well if Jesus was a real person, and I suppose thats plenty possible, and he decided to get tortured so that people wouldn't have to go to hell then I'd feel a bit sorry for him. Seeing as how I would have to figure he went through all that for nothing.

To prove that he died, not because HE belived in hell, but to actually keep us from going there would mean you would have to prove that there was really a Hell. Now if you could do that then I'd sit on a wooden bench and listen to a what ever the nice preacher wanted to tell me.

Answer 4

First off I am a Christian and I go on Faith, that is the only way for me. I do not think that people who do not now believe in Jesus Christ would automatically believe even of the missing pieces of the puzzle were put in there for them. But like for me going on Faith just because, they go on their own belief systems.
BTW even if ur not a Christian i <3 u anyway.

Answer 5

Of course I feel bad that he died while believing he was helping man kind. I mean there's no denying the fact that Jesus was real and he was really crucified, it can't be a coincidence that hundreds of historical documents match up with this story about a man claiming to be the king of Jews. But I believe he was a mentally unstable man that wanted attention, so I definitely feel bad that he died for a non-existent cause.

Answer 6

If there was undeniable proof that Jesus died for our sins, then Christianity would be destroyed as a faith, wouldn't it? I don't know if I would feel badly about it or not, I mean I've spent my whole life with one belief system, so I figure I would probably have a bit of a crisis w/ my faith, but the man died nearly 2000 years ago, how do you feel bad for someone that long dead?

Answer 7

I'm agnostic and in all honesty, if there was absolutely undeniable proof (which is nearly impossible) I would not feel remorse for not believing in it before. I would obviously be thankful and celebrate christianity as a fact, but until that day, i'll keep my views.

Answer 8

As an atheist, the idea of Jesus dying for anyone does not make sense to me. Of course I feel sorry when anyone dies or suffers, but the statement that he "saved" anyone is meaningless. And what's more, I think that Jesus is a legend and not a historical character.

Answer 9

Josephus, a Jewish historian, suggested Jesus in his writings in the direction of the top of the 1st century C.E., greater or less 60 years after Jesus' demise. As a non-Christian, Josephus could have no reason to settle for the historic fact of Jesus until eventually there replaced into some sound foundation for it. in a single of his works, Josephus discusses disturbances that have been brought about by potential of the Jews in the time of the time Pontius Pilate replaced into governor of the region of Judea (26-36 C.E,) The disturbance wide-unfold around a guy named Jesuss and his followers, Josephus identifies Jesus as "a clever guy....a doer of surprising works, a instructor of adult males who won the certainty with exhilaration," and he notes that Jesus replaced into later condemned by potential of Pilate to crucifixion. mutually as this point out of Jesu would not advise that Josephus himself popular Jesus or the declare made approximately Jesus by potential of his followers, it does look sparkling that Josephus acknowledged Jesus to be a historic man or woman who had a profound effect on the human beings he encountered. study additionally approximately Tacitus, a Roman historian.....Pliny the greater youthful yet another Roman source and Suetonius a Roman historian and lawyer. those style of writers prepare the historic existence of Jesus......quite than biblical components.

Answer 10

i dont discount anything JC may or may not have done. I would feel bad that he decided to do something that would amount to nothing -to no avail. there is no heaven or hell - history has clearly shown us that religion was created out of a need to believe that life will be better than it actually is. so all religion is just a form of self delusion. whether or not there is irrefutable evidence of his ACTIONS does not mean that there is indisputable evidence of heaven or hell or god or anything. you follow me ?