If they get caught 'micro-evolving', they deserve a stern warning. But if they get caught 'macro-evolving', well, that's just wrong.
I wonder if I need to add a disclaimer stating that modern biology doesn't actually draw a distinction between the two.
2007-12-20 09:21:26
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
7⤊
0⤋
You cant oppose evolution . You cant oppose sunshine and the rain falls on the good and the bad....The original god was the creator . He was evolution and then he became the word. And the word was god and then he became flesh . God is powerful and evolving. So too is man evolving but in words now. New concepts are words
2016-05-25 05:18:59
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
In Hawaii, the punishment has been rapid extinction through habitat loss and introduction of non-native competitors and predators.
2007-12-20 09:41:00
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I am of the opinion that the evolution of animals and plants is possible but that human beings had no need to evolve beyond being made in the image of God.
2007-12-20 09:21:08
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
Death! AND and order of the court demanding the cease and desist all further evolution.
2007-12-20 09:26:42
·
answer #5
·
answered by That's Why 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
"what do you think the punishment should be ....."
They should be forced to devolve into presidential candidates , or with time off for good behavior , televangelists
(Dude, you've outdone yourself . This is an instant classic . =)))))))
2007-12-20 12:40:00
·
answer #6
·
answered by mikeinportc 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
If evolution is outlawed, only outlaws will evolve.
2007-12-20 09:29:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by Pull My Finger 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
They have to go to a Creationist lesson to be taught the error of their ways.
2007-12-20 09:24:14
·
answer #8
·
answered by Mancloud 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
eternal evolvement
2007-12-20 09:20:50
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Well, they have to catch something evolving first.
2007-12-20 09:22:25
·
answer #10
·
answered by johnusmaximus1 6
·
0⤊
2⤋