English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Randy Carpenter! did a research to find the exclamations, parentheses, etc.. that Strong's did not cover, from King James 1611, here is the site if you have not seen it :)

http://www.geocities.com/thecarpenterfiles/

2007-12-20 05:31:03 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

kjv I went to see the site and watched about 10 minutes of it, thanks :)

2007-12-20 05:44:04 · update #1

5 answers

Thanks. I will add it to my favorites. I have a copy of the KJ 1611 Bible but not the original one. I also have Strong's Exclusive Concordance of the Bible.

2007-12-20 05:36:59 · answer #1 · answered by Pancakke 3 · 1 0

Saw and read part of it. I think by the time you get through the whole thing you would probably have a breakdown. The point of that whole ordeal to me is pointless. It is very simple, men simply wrote stories that were handed down and changed thousands of years ago. They were metaphors and myths. End of story.

Further. had we deciphered Cuneiform or hieroglyphs before the stories were in this book the world would be a very different place today.

2007-12-20 13:42:27 · answer #2 · answered by Tricia R 5 · 0 1

Yep it's Nice ! got a lot of useful info in the collections

2007-12-20 13:34:37 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

That's why we have other interpretations of the Bible.

2007-12-20 13:37:40 · answer #4 · answered by Big Bear 7 · 1 0

Self prorogation at its best.....

Have you read all the awesome things sansfear has written. Boy is he smart.....

2007-12-20 13:34:29 · answer #5 · answered by ɹɐǝɟsuɐs Blessed Cheese Maker 7 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers